- GPS2000 評論時間: 2024-05-10 16:21:33, 贊: 1, 回復數: 0
我們是否要省選了？開始開支票了！
- MyLuckIsBack 評論時間: 2024-05-10 16:19:55, 贊: 1, 回復數: 0
吃飽了撐的退110塊 總共退4億，一個人110，要退給差不多4百萬人，光是郵票就要花4百萬，不然其他的開支。 直接續保的時候免除110，開支是0 但是不退支票，怎麼能讓人看到政府又發錢了呢？ 同時，BC省負債累累，已經連續兩次被信貸降級。
- Hewett 評論時間: 2024-05-10 07:22:35, 贊: 1, 回復數: 0
開放競爭者不就得了！
- 游客 [友.文.載.述] 評論時間: 2024-05-09 21:10:05, 贊: 2, 回復數: 0
無過錯保險也可以引入私營保險競爭，投保人可以得到更好的服務。現在ICBC就是個政府的騙子，通過克扣延遲出險人的賠付來盈利，最終會遭報應的
- xyz168 評論時間: 2024-05-09 11:58:19, 贊: 2, 回復數: 0
Your theory is correct when you are not a victim of a car accident and seriously injured…how about a pedestrian hit by a car? So just wish you will never be involved in an accident and seriously injured. People never care if things haven’t happened to themselves. Just because the victims are a small portion of the population so the politicians chose to ignore and sacrifice them.
- 游客 [辛.香.氏.說] 評論時間: 2024-05-08 23:17:07, 贊: 0, 回復數: 1
For those who need more coverage of insurance, they can use this rebate and savings from previous insurance premium to buy commercial insurance to have themselves fully covered. Unlimited coverage of insurance by suing ICBC and those involved in the traffic accidents through lawsuits caused super high insurance premium for everyone. We cannot enjoy lower insurance premium and complain the less coverage at the same time. The money you get paid by insurance in the accidents is paid by everyone, not the insurance company.
- xyz168 評論時間: 2024-05-08 19:45:43, 贊: 2, 回復數: 0
犧牲少數車禍受害人的利益來降低大多數人的保費來拉選票。大家自求多福吧，如果不幸成為車禍受害者，就會知道這是個多麼無賴的制度。不管傷得多重，都不能告ICBC,不能告肇事司機，這就是所謂的無過錯制度，鼓勵馬路殺手的制度。
- 游客 [畜.香.湯.者] 評論時間: 2024-05-08 16:11:34, 贊: 2, 回復數: 0
為什麼是獨裁？不是兩黨輪流執政嗎？以前沒有錯判嗎？以前保險費高多了吧？
- 游客 [欲.此.子.御] 評論時間: 2024-05-08 12:50:43, 贊: 5, 回復數: 1
伊大衛改革下的ICBC靠著獨載流氓手段賺取了盈利，冤判了多少案子。伊大衛下次大選必須下台！
- 游客 [此.昔.百.仁] 評論時間: 2024-05-08 12:24:48, 贊: 8, 回復數: 0
先收再退，就是收多了唄。這是恩賜嗎？就是借機拉拉選票。
好消息！ICBC發保費退款 車保不漲 的評論
