回音宝宝 _BBCODE_WROTE: |
如果是旧车, 伤"引擎" 之说或者成立.
我开 05 年 MATRIX, 多年来去美国过关时停车就关引擎, 一来省油, 二来减排.
|
那不同,过关一年到头能有几次啊?这个技术,就普通上下班我估计一天起码都要30次起停。
Turn off your ignition if you’re waiting more than 10 seconds. Contrary to popular belief, restarting your car does not burn more fuel than leaving it idling. In fact, idling for just 10 seconds wastes more gas than restarting the engine.
Protect your car engine by idling less. Frequent restarts are no longer hard on a car’s engine and battery. The added wear (which amounts to no more than $10 a year) is much less costly than the cost of wasted fuel (which can add up to $70-650 a year, depending on fuel prices, idling habits and vehicle type). Idling actually increases overall engine wear by causing the car to operate for longer than necessary.
www.edf.org/climate/reports/idling
蓝海007 _BBCODE_WROTE: |
似乎就是为省油吧,如果常在市区跑,红绿灯多倒确实能省点油,长跑高速的意义不大 。明年丰田的highlander也会用这个技术,它在技术采纳上相对保守,既然它也要用,那说明还是过关的。
|
我暂时是偏向继续用这个功能。看看效果如何。我也觉得厂商都采纳,自然会有考虑,如果这东西真的会严重影响汽车质量,也不会蠢到把自己的声誉赔进去吧?
鲁尼 _BBCODE_WROTE: |
你的意见是关掉他?
|
利与害刚好是50%对50%,频繁起停绝对是有害于发动机的,省点汽油不值几个钱。为什么各大厂商争先恐后应用这个技术呢?因为多上一个新技术,面子上就多一点亮光。较好的办法还是加入人脑,停得不久的,还是连续运转吧,停得久的(估计三分钟以上)就轻点停机、轻点起动。
回音宝宝 _BBCODE_WROTE: |
Turn off your ignition if you’re waiting more than 10 seconds. Contrary to popular belief, restarting your car does not burn more fuel than leaving it idling. In fact, idling for just 10 seconds wastes more gas than restarting the engine.
Protect your car engine by idling less. Frequent restarts are no longer hard on a car’s engine and battery. The added wear (which amounts to no more than $10 a year) is much less costly than the cost of wasted fuel (which can add up to $70-650 a year, depending on fuel prices, idling habits and vehicle type). Idling actually increases overall engine wear by causing the car to operate for longer than necessary.
www.edf.org/climate/reports/idling
|
其实也是,如果这技术真的这么多人反对,而且的确是让返修率大幅争高的话,就不会越来越多的新车采用这个技术了。
鲁尼 _BBCODE_WROTE: |
那不同,过关一年到头能有几次啊?这个技术,就普通上下班我估计一天起码都要30次起停。
|
我连走 main / terminal 都关引擎, 因为那个灯位等候时间实在太长了.
一条龙 _BBCODE_WROTE: |
利与害刚好是50%对50%,频繁起停绝对是有害于发动机的,省点汽油不值几个钱。为什么各大厂商争先恐后应用这个技术呢?因为多上一个新技术,面子上就多一点亮光。较好的办法还是加入人脑,停得不久的,还是连续运转吧,停得久的(估计三分钟以上)就轻点停机、轻点起动。
|
但是经过这么多年,如果这个技术让车厂的返修率大幅争高的话,车厂还愿意让这个技术逐渐成为标配吗?(别误会,我对这个技术没有立场,仍然在听大家的意见之中)