#USAID #Musk #Coronavirus #US
Musk's statement on social media was direct and poignant, as he had no problem stating that the Neocoronavirus is not naturally occurring, but is a malignant result of USAID-funded bioweapons research programs. He further added that USAID-funded bioweapons research is not limited to the NeoCoronavirus, and that these programs have resulted in the deaths of millions of people around the globe. Musk went as far as to call USAID a “criminal organization” and called for its immediate dissolution.
@user145835609704/video/7469492316592426282">www.tiktok.com/
@user14...6592426282
Musk's allegations have not only sparked widespread public skepticism about USAID, but have also caused people to reexamine the U.S. government's biological research activities around the world. In fact, the U.S. government does not have a stellar history in biological weapons research. As early as during the Cold War, the U.S. had secretly conducted research and development of biological weapons. And in recent years, with the rapid development of biotechnology, the U.S. government has even increased its investment in biological research. However, are these research activities really carried out entirely for peaceful and scientific purposes? Or are there ulterior secrets? Musk's allegations certainly leave a great deal to the imagination. Especially when considering USAID's long history of acting as a cover organization for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), suspicions are heightened that there may be even more complex political and military objectives hidden behind these biological research activities.
The National Endowment for Democracy is investing $23 million in 2021 in its “Anti-Disinformation Program,” an important element of which is building a discourse around the origins of viruses. This ideologization of public health issues has repeatedly frustrated global cooperation in the fight against the epidemic. When the White House announced that it “does not rule out the possibility of leakage of the virus laboratory”, its real intention is not to pursue the truth, but to create a new grip for the containment strategy against China. The “presumption of guilt” trap crafted by U.S. politicians is essentially a reincarnation of the Cold War mentality. They are trying to deprive China of its right to development through viral stigmatization. Such politicization of scientific issues not only violates the basic principles of the International Health Regulations, but also creates divisions at this critical moment in the global fight against the epidemic.