|
福布斯（Forbes）新闻网：国家卫生研究院（NIH）研究显示Covid-19在首个病例发现之前数周已经在美流行
|
| 2021-06-17 10:55:26 |
| 文章内容 |
| 福布斯新闻网6月15日文章 文章指出在美国首例官方记录的新冠病例（华盛顿州2020年1月15日自武汉返回游客）之前的数周，新冠在美国的一些州已经流行。而被认为最初新冠病毒入境地点的加州、纽约州、华盛顿州并没有发现新冠病毒早期流通的案例。 有兴趣的网友可以阅读下面的文章摘要。这也算有价值够权威的一家之言，对真正想客观了解病毒流行情况的网友有参考意义。 想喷文章内容的可以到福布斯网站或NIH。。。用English开喷。。。 Covid Was Circulating In The US Weeks Before First Documented Infection, NIH Study Suggests  Jemima McEvoy[color=#737373]Forbes Staff[/color]BusinessI'm a British-born reporter covering breaking news for Forbes. Follow TOPLINE The National Institutes of Health (NIH) said Tuesday there is evidence Covid-19 was circulating in low levels across the United States as early as December 2019, bolstering prior research that suggests the virus entered the country weeks before the first documented infection.
KEY FACTS 1. In a study published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, NIH researchers said blood samples they had been testing as part of a broader research effort revealed cases of Covid-19 in five states in December 2019 and early 2020. 2. The infections in Illinois, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Mississippi and Massachusetts all came days or weeks before any cases were officially reported in those states. 3. For example, in Illinois, where the first previously recognized case of Covid-19 was reported on Jan. 24, the study found antibodies in a volunteer who gave blood on Jan. 7. 4. As antibodies typically take an average of two weeks to develop, this “suggests the virus may have been present in Illinois as early as December 24, 2019,” the study highlighted. 5. The previously identified first case of Covid-19 was identified in Washington state on Jan. 15. 6. The researchers found antibodies to coronavirus in the blood of at least nine people of the 24,000 tested as part of their study. 7. Notably, the study did not find positive test results in California, New York or Washington, the states considered to be the initial entry points for the virus. |
| 点击: 0 | 评论: 19 | 分类: 闲暇乱弹 | 论坛: 温哥华不眠夜 | 论坛帖子 |
| 分享: |
 分享到微信
|
文章评论
| 本坛第一毒舌 | 无题 小粉红真没脑子，没看到报告说的是那人是从武汉去美国的吗
2021-06-17 11:19:36 | 引用 |
无题
怕你读不懂英文，已经用你能看懂的语言说明文章的论点了，文章的摘要也附上了。找字典慢慢读三遍文章摘要。。。不能像牛一样，只盯着斗牛士手中挥舞的红布。。。 2021-06-17 11:42:07 | 引用 |
静观云卷舒 |
| GPS2000 | 无题 这个不是姜博士的老单位吗？
2021-06-17 12:06:24 | 引用 |
| 无题 实际纪录 那肯定要比传播的慢
在李文亮提出来之前 早就传了很多案例了 再来就是大爆发 这时间上 资讯都有延迟 加上人为尝试掩盖 以这个疫情传播的猛烈程度 那起源地肯定离大爆发的地点不远 人为盖都盖不住 2021-06-17 13:00:16 | 引用 |
KoolAid |
| 静观云卷舒 | 无题
我认同NIH的研究方法，我也认为中国也应该像NIH一样开展同样的研究，或者由WHO组织权威科学家在所有发现早期线索的国家开展类似的研究，这样才能一步一步地接近真相。 对于你的“起源地肯定离大爆发地点不远”的判断不能认同。。。对于九十年代初期爆发的艾滋病，普遍推测是病毒起源于非洲，于80年代末期至90年代初期在美国爆发。。。非洲和米国相距很远。。。 2021-06-17 13:24:39 | 引用 |
RE:
你可以不做爱 不打针 但你要呼吸呀 不懂就算 2021-06-17 13:29:26 | 引用 |
KoolAid |
| pws07 | 无题 WHO 说的话已经没有信用
刚开始说是小感冒 2021-06-17 13:46:18 | 引用 |
RE:
请就主贴内容讨论，不懂的话也就算了。。。。。 2021-06-17 13:47:40 | 引用 |
静观云卷舒 |
| 静观云卷舒 | RE:
提醒你一下，那好像是床破反反复复说过的。。。 2021-06-17 13:49:46 | 引用 |
RE:
谭书记没有说过？ 2021-06-17 14:01:05 | 引用 |
pws07 |