[Jackal]

刚才吃早餐时看见的。 www.reuters.com/articl...3720120706 Florida lifeguard Tomas Lopez was fired after he tried to save a man's life -- an example of how a company's fear of liability can sometimes make waves and backfire.

[本那比经略]

是不是救生公司觉得万一没救过来被家属起诉了，要赔得底掉？

[grinder]

Fired Florida lifeguard to be offered job back
By Dylan Stableford, Yahoo! News | The Lookout – 22 hours ago

The Florida lifeguard who was fired after leaving his "zone" to help save a swimmer earlier this week will be offered his job back, the head of the company that fired him said Thursday.
"I am of the opinion that the supervisors acted hastily," Jeff Ellis told the Orlando Sun Sentinel. "It was not the appropriate course of action to take.
But according to the Associated Press, Tomas Lopez, the 21-year-old Hallandale Beach lifeguard, said previously he wouldn't accept an offer to return.
Lopez was fired on Monday after he left his station to help a man who had been pulled out of the water in an unprotected area of Hallandale Beach. According to the Sentinel, Lopez and an off-duty nurse tended to the man, a 21-year-old from Estonia, until paramedics arrived. The man—who is recovering at a local hospital—was in a "swim at your own risk" area of the beach about 1,500 feet south of the boundary lifeguards are expected to patrol.
"I was on stand, and guests came up to me and told me there was someone drowning, that people were screaming and so I started running in the direction," Lopez told NBC Miami. "I ran out to do the job I was trained to do—I didn't think about it at all."
Lopez' dismissal sparked near-immediate criticism; two fellow guards quit in protest.
"We are not a fire-rescue operation," Ellis told the paper earlier this week. "We are strictly a lifeguard organization—we limit what we do to the protected swimming zones that we've agreed to service." The company has provided lifeguards for the area's public beaches and pools since 2003.
"We have liability issues and can't go out of the protected area," Lopez's supervisor, Susan Ellis, told WPTV. "What he did was his own decision. He knew the company rules and did what he thought he needed to do."
"If we find our actions on the part of the leadership team were inappropriate, we will rectify it based upon the information that comes forward," Ellis added.
"We take the safety of all visitors to our beaches very seriously," Hallandale Beach City Manager Renee Crichton said in a statement. "Whether they are in a protected area or unprotected area, we believe aid must be rendered."

[dingjerry]

who knows

[Jackal]

本那比经略 写道:

是不是救生公司觉得万一没救过来被家属起诉了,要赔得底掉?:roll:

我猜应该是万一此时该救生员的防区也出了事故,救生公司会赔底掉。

[Emirato]

不知道这里有多少人了解这行。

救生员，或者急救员，保护自己永远是第一位的。
而且必须严格按照步骤来。

如果你溺水，不要指望马上会有人下去救，步骤很多，先扔你圈，然后拿棍儿桶，游近了以后先踢你一脚

[一步一脚印]

Emirato 写道:

不知道这里有多少人了解这行。 救生员,或者急救员,保护自己永远是第一位的。 而且必须严格按照步骤来。 如果你溺水,不要指望马上会有人下去救,步骤很多,先扔你圈,然后拿棍儿桶,游近了以后先踢你一脚

first aids training上来就告诉你。。。自己最重要,无论做什么首先确保自己安全。。。什么舍己救人在这儿根本就行不通。。。而且我也很赞成这种理论。。。

[Jackal]

Emirato 写道:

不知道这里有多少人了解这行。 救生员,或者急救员,保护自己永远是第一位的。 而且必须严格按照步骤来。 如果你溺水,不要指望马上会有人下去救,步骤很多,先扔你圈,然后拿棍儿桶,游近了以后先踢你一脚

这个案例不是救人步骤或者是否保护自己的问题。而是救生公司优先考虑潜在的法律风险而忽视现实的人身安全。