| 廣告聯系 | 簡體版 | 手機版 | 微信 | 微博 | 搜索:
歡迎您 游客 | 登錄 | 免費注冊 | 忘記了密碼 | 社交賬號注冊或登錄

首頁

新聞資訊

論壇

溫哥華地產

大溫餐館點評

溫哥華汽車

溫哥華教育

黃頁/二手

旅游
搜索:  

 論壇通告:  加西磅停用通知   請不要上傳第三方有版權的照片,請尊重版權,謝謝   轉載新聞請務必注明出處,這些媒體請不要轉,謝謝   批評商家需要注意  
 個人空間: 豬頭看世界 | 羅蓬特機器人 | 客觀中立而實事求是,唯服理據而杜絕辱罵 | 真情Z下海 | House Owner | Amy Yi | 五木森林 | 顧曉軍 | 花隨風 | 靜觀雲卷雲舒 | 呂洪來的個人空間 | XY | 大溫房產和地產研究 | 湖裡湖塗 | 異鄉的世界 | 一襲絳襦落鵬城,疑似玄女下九天 | dwx | 亂想 | 北口前面 | 萬國商貿
 最新求助: 請問誰知道哪裡有賣理發的電動推子?   忽然有個疑問:戰爭時期,加拿大拿PR卡未入籍的永久居民會被強制服兵役嗎?   這個銀條   如何修改會員名?
 論壇轉跳:
     發帖回帖獲取加西鎊, 兌換精彩禮物

論壇首頁 -> 溫哥華不眠夜

唉,星期五起,carbon tax又要加1.1 cent鳥 (發表於14年前)



回復主題  圖片幻燈展示  增添帖子到書簽中  給帖子中的發貼者批量贈送獻花或者花籃    |##| -> |=|        發表新主題
閱讀上一個主題 :: 閱讀下一個主題  
作者 正文
藍辣椒
(只看此人)




文章 時間: 2011-6-29 09:31 引用回復
油價剛下來一兩cent,又給政府加回去鳥

a208.gif a208.gif a208.gif
 
花籃
分享
樓主 | 電梯直達
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
論壇廣告 溫哥華金鑰匙會計事務所,收費低標准,服務高質量!
人黃豬老
(只看此人)




文章 時間: 2011-6-29 09:53 引用回復
這個碳稅到底有沒有審計啊?
 
花籃
分享
_________________
此ID已死,有事請燒紙。
沙發 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
論壇廣告 請關注北美中文網每周電器促銷,優惠多多!
人黃豬老
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2011-6-29 09:57 引用回復
來吧,省政府財政廳的《碳稅迷思》

Myths and Facts About the Carbon Tax

Myth: The carbon tax is just a tax grab.

Fact: Every dollar raised by the carbon tax is returned to individuals and businesses through tax reductions. None of the carbon tax revenue is used to fund government spending.

Since the carbon tax was introduced on July 1, 2008, some $848 million has been collected. However, the corresponding tax cuts have returned over $1,042 million to British Columbians. That is $194 million more in British Columbian pockets thanks to the revenue neutral tax on carbon emissions.

Myth: Industry/business are exempt from the carbon tax.

Fact: Industry is not exempt from the carbon tax. Industry is required to pay the carbon tax on the purchase and use of fossil fuels the same as everyone else and they also pay tax at the same rate. For example, the oil and gas industry will pay the carbon tax on all combustion of fossil fuels, estimated at 85 per cent of their total emissions, including flaring, and the cement industry will pay the tax based on the coal and tires they burn in the production of cement.

Myth: Many emissions are not taxed.

Fact: The carbon tax has the broadest base possible given current technological, measurement and data limitations and applies to virtually all emissions from fossil fuel combustion in British Columbia captured in Environment Canada’s National Inventory Report.
The carbon tax applies to all emissions from burning fossil fuels, which accounts for an estimated 77 per cent of total emissions in British Columbia.
Of the 23 per cent of emissions that are not from burning fossil fuels:

10 per cent are from non-energy agricultural uses (e.g. emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management, and agricultural soils) and waste (landfills);
9 per cent are from fugitive emissions which cannot currently be accurately measured; and
Only 4 per cent are non-combustion industrial process emissions.

The Province will look at options to extend the carbon tax to emissions beyond those generated by the burning of fossil fuels, and integrate the carbon tax with other climate action initiates such as cap-and-trade.

Myth: The carbon tax unfairly impacts low-income British Columbians.

Fact: Most low-income individuals and families are better off under the revenue neutral carbon tax than they were before. A major component of the personal and business income tax cuts provided as part of the revenue neutral carbon tax is the ongoing low income climate action tax credit designed to help protect low income individuals and families. The credit is paid quarterly along with the federal GST credit and BC HST Credit.

The credit as of July 1, 2010 provides an annual maximum of $105 for each adult and $31.50 for each child ($105 for the first child in a single parent family). The maximum credit is reduced by 2 per cent of net income in excess of $30,600 for single individuals ($35,700 for families) The maximum tax credit amounts increases by 10 per cent July 1, 2011 to $115.50 per adult and $34.50 per child. The reduction thresholds are indexed to provincial inflation.

Myth: Government said that the carbon tax is revenue neutral for every individual.

Fact: Government said it would return every dollar collected from the carbon tax to taxpayers through tax cuts. The tax cuts for individuals and families for the years 2009/10 to 2012/13 fiscal years consist of:

The first two personal income tax bracket rates were reduced by 5 per cent effective January 1, 2008;
Low Income Climate Action tax credit paid quarterly along with the federal GST credit and BC HST Credit with a maximum annual benefit of $105 per adult and $31.50 per child ($105 for the first child in a single parent family) as of July 1, 2009. The credit will increase by 10 per cent on July 1, 2011;
A Northern and Rural Homeowner benefit of up to $200 starting in the 2011 taxation year.

Revenue neutrality is intended to apply to the total carbon tax revenues collected rather than on a sector by sector or individual basis. If everyone was given back the exact amount of carbon tax they paid there would be no incentive to use less fossil fuel and reduce emissions. Some individuals, businesses, or sectors will pay more than they receive through recycling measures and some will pay less, but the carbon tax as a whole is revenue neutral. All carbon tax revenue is returned to taxpayers through tax cuts.

Myth: Government gets more tax revenue when gas prices rise.

Fact: The carbon tax, like the other B.C. fuel taxes on gasoline and diesel, is levied on a per volume basis and is not related to the selling price of the fuel. The government collects the same amount of carbon tax per litre at any price. For example, if someone bought 100 litres of gasoline they would pay $4.45 in carbon tax when the tax is at $20 per tonne of CO 2e. This is the case whether the gas costs 50 cents per litre or $2.00 per litre. In fact, to the extent that higher prices lead to lower consumption, the B.C. government will get less tax revenue.

Myth: The carbon tax applies to goods other than fuel (e.g. vehicles).

Fact: The carbon tax is only applied to the purchase and use of fossil fuels in B.C. Therefore, it is applied to gasoline or diesel used in a motor vehicle but does not apply to the vehicle itself.


Myth: People are being double taxed because local governments have to pay the tax and because they do not get income tax reductions taxpayers will have to pay again.

Fact: All of the revenue from the carbon tax, whether from individuals, businesses, or local governments is returned to British Columbians through personal and business tax cuts.
Local governments and School Districts that commit to carbon neutrality by 2012 can access the Climate Action Revenue Incentive, a grant that offsets the carbon tax local governments and school districts pay.
Those municipalities that move soonest to reduce their fossil fuel consumption create the greatest benefits for their residents. In addition to the tax cuts funded by the carbon tax, municipalities have the opportunity to pass the carbon tax and fuel savings back to their local ratepayers.

Myth: The carbon tax is just another gas tax. It does not actually tax carbon dioxide emissions.

Fact: The carbon tax is a tax on carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2e) emissions generated from the burning of all fossil fuels in B.C. including gasoline, diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, propane and coal. It is not just a “gas tax.”
Environment Canada determines emission factors (EFs) that measure the CO2e emitted from combusting each type of fossil fuel. The EFs are reported in Environment Canada’s “National Inventory Report, Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks.” The B.C. carbon tax rates for different fossil fuels are determined by the amount of CO 2e emitted when the fuels are combusted.

Myth: When gas prices rise by so much, there is no need for a carbon tax.

Fact: The historical volatility of gas prices, rising and then falling, has blunted the price signal for consumers and resulted in less conservation than required to meet government’s targets. The purpose of the carbon tax is to ensure that a consistent long term price signal is provided to consumers so that they continue to make the choices required to reduce their fossil fuel use and emissions.

Myth: Many people have no alternatives and no way to reduce their emissions.

Fact: Business and individuals can choose to reduce their carbon tax by reducing usage, increasing efficiency, changing fuels, adopting new technology or any combination of these approaches. We can all begin to make the small changes towards a cleaner future that fit into our own individual circumstances, such as choosing energy efficient lights, lowering the temperature on the thermostat at night, or keeping our cars tuned-up. Simply driving 10 km less per week will more than offset the cost of the carbon tax for most British Columbians.

Myth: The carbon tax will not have any effect on people’s behaviour.

Fact: The tax is based on the assumption that consumers respond to price signals. The purpose of the tax is to send a price signal to reduce the use of fossil fuels and thereby emissions. Several studies show that consumers generally respond to higher gasoline prices by reducing consumption either by purchasing more fuel efficient vehicles or by driving less.
Based on new car sales data for British Columbia since 2001, it is evident that the increase in gasoline prices has caused many consumers to buy more fuel efficient vehicles. The market share of subcompact and compact passenger car sales has increased steadily while the market share of larger cars, SUVs, pickups and minivans has declined.

Myth: The carbon tax will adversely affect the economy.

Fact: By returning all of the carbon tax revenues to the people of British Columbia through tax cuts, we will keep our economy strong. In a recent affirmation of B.C.’s triple-A credit rating, Moody’s recognized that B.C.’s revenue-neutral carbon tax will allow us to continue the trend of personal and business tax cuts. Moody’s has told investors that the tax reductions made possible by the carbon tax help keep B.C. competitive with other jurisdictions and encourage investment.

Myth: The carbon tax will have virtually no impact on reducing B.C.’s greenhouse gas emissions.
Fact: British Columbia’s carbon tax is one of the broadest and most comprehensive in the world. The fossil fuels included in the tax base account for about 75 per cent of British Columbia’s current GHG emissions. At current rates the carbon tax itself will initially have a small impact on emissions. However, this was intentional. The tax rates were deliberately set low to begin with and scheduled to rise slowly over time to send the correct price signal while giving consumers and businesses time to reduce their fossil fuel use. It is important to look at the whole range of initiatives government is introducing to meet its targets rather than just the tax.
 
花籃
分享
_________________
此ID已死,有事請燒紙。
板凳 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
論壇廣告 口水直流!加西網推出大溫餐館點評!發評論就可掙加西鎊!
藍辣椒
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2011-6-29 09:57 引用回復
人黃豬老 寫道:
這個碳稅到底有沒有審計啊?


據說一cent都沒有用到該用的地方 icon_evil.gif icon_evil.gif
 
花籃
分享
地板 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
四維
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2011-6-29 09:59 引用回復
罵得,老金這個WBD!
 
花籃
分享
_________________
夢幻泡影
5 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
人黃豬老
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2011-6-29 10:12 引用回復
藍辣椒 寫道:
人黃豬老 寫道:
這個碳稅到底有沒有審計啊?


據說一cent都沒有用到該用的地方 icon_evil.gif icon_evil.gif


所以說啊,上碳稅的時候說的是,這個稅不會用於fund任何其他的government program. 如果也沒有用在環保上,那就是蒸發了唄……
 
花籃
分享
_________________
此ID已死,有事請燒紙。
6 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
abc2011
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2011-6-29 10:15 引用回復
evergreen缺錢也要加汽油稅
 
花籃
分享
7 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
四維
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2011-6-29 10:16 引用回復
人黃豬老 寫道:
藍辣椒 寫道:
人黃豬老 寫道:
這個碳稅到底有沒有審計啊?


據說一cent都沒有用到該用的地方 icon_evil.gif icon_evil.gif


所以說啊,上碳稅的時候說的是,這個稅不會用於fund任何其他的government program. 如果也沒有用在環保上,那就是蒸發了唄……


審計署不管麼?
 
花籃
分享
_________________
夢幻泡影
8 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
 
回復主題     |##| -> |=|     論壇首頁 -> 溫哥華不眠夜 所有的時間均為 美國太平洋時間
1頁,共1


注:
  • 以上論壇所有發言僅代表發帖者個人觀點, 並不代表本站觀點或立場, 加西網對此不負任何責任。
  • 投資理財及買房賣房版面的帖子不構成投資建議。投資有風險,責任請自負
  • 對二手買賣中的虛假信息,買賣中的糾紛等均與本站無關。
  • 不能在本論壇發表新主題
    不能在本論壇回復主題
    不能在本論壇編輯自己的文章
    不能在本論壇刪除自己的文章
    不能在本論壇發表投票
    不能在這個論壇添加附件
    可以在這個論壇下載文件

    論壇轉跳: 

    藍辣椒, 人黃豬老, 人黃豬老, 藍辣椒, 四維, 人黃豬老, abc2011, 四維
    潛力帖子 精華帖子 熱門帖子
    AI正在學習擺脫人類控制
    六四開槍視頻,嚇的嗷嗷跑,這種大屠...
    每日讀經 (十四)
    六月初四 發生了什麼事?
    今天是六月三日,還有一天
    牆內你看不見六四
    相當無語。。。
    強 J 也可以叫做 進出?
    以色列暴行小統計
    8964
    美國小鎮小人物大官威事件
    中共到底有沒有抗日?
    反思六四,溫家寶大和解改革才是正確...
    俄烏戰爭
    都哪兒去了?
    大溫地區換幣活動現場報道
    全國巡回換幣活動 : 2026 FIFA世界...
    粵桂之爭的隱秘戰線:從陸榮廷到陳...
    Royal Canadian Mint 皇家鑄幣廠202...
    Royal Canadian Mint 皇家鑄幣廠202...
    TransLink推出限量版Hello Kitty公交卡
    換幣活動: $2元 國家電視塔 50 周年...
    加拿大將發行紀念皇家軍團(The Roy...
    加拿大將發行第二枚夜光幣
    Royal Canadian Mint 皇家鑄幣廠202...
    奧蘭多(二)迪士尼動物王國 未來世界...
    奧蘭多(一)城市地標及海洋世界
    Royal Canadian Mint 2026年2月新幣
    坎昆(一)
    推薦一個digital的手持放大鏡
    特朗普又幹了件冒天下之大不韙的事...
    本宮鋼琴彈奏原聲第1彈 一首前奏曲
    謝謝管理員秉公執法廢除reddragon的id
    超級重磅!加拿大要進口中國電動車!
    皮爾今天在溫哥華 - 藍色wave - 保...
    幾分鍾前,中國強硬反擊,征34+50,...
    曼谷高樓直接倒了
    我說我希望特朗普贏,老公氣得眼睛...
    知乎?加西網上為什麼有老流氓劉廳...
    明明有能力統台,大陸為何遲遲不動手?
    貌似ndp稍占上風。。。。。
    今天是感恩節,跟大家道個別,以後...
    咱最後還是投了ndp
    生平第一次被偷車了
    中國會不會武統台灣

    最新新聞 熱門新聞 熱評新聞
    太嚇人!車裡一瓶水竟可能點燃座椅
    逃離北上廣!中國年輕人擠爆尼泊爾
    華裔探員Costco遭警當眾辱華施暴
    特朗普仍考慮與賴清德通話 北京警告或損關系改善
    溫村法院強拍"斷頭房"3天就被秒了
    蔡奇出任中央黨校校長 黨內影響力進一步提升
    美台在AI與無人機尖端科技領域打造安全供應鏈
    美軍:伊朗向兩國發射了7枚導彈 其中6枚被攔截
    擊穿幻想:科技股為何在"好消息"中蒸發萬億美元
    從最美郭芙到豪門棄婦 她如今盡情享受單身生活
    普京長女罕見亮相,眉眼氣場神似父親
    黃仁勳在韓國被網站「追蹤」,5天狂攬10萬圍觀
    河南中專生成北大博士:這不是逆襲 只是回到正常
    美國企業重新給DeepSeek打錢!登頂新增采購榜
    南美洲最窮國翻身 GDP成長5年爆增4倍
    吹哨人:特朗普政府曾想"賜死"270萬人 趕走移民
    一個社會學博士,為何選擇在縣級養老院當"護理員"
    黎巴嫩領導人警告伊朗不要幹涉黎巴嫩內政
    獲央視點贊的6部高分好劇,全都是值得反復刷的寶藏
    真實事件改編的5部神劇,每部都夠敢拍,你還記得幾部?
    劉翔沒工作卻坐擁十億?這筆賬算完你更難受
    倪妮井柏然分手8年,為何仍是內娛意難平
    戚薇李承鉉甜上熱搜,安以軒傾盡所有被辜負
    湯道生姚順雨對談:騰訊AI的下半場
    一天熱死3400人,印度也要限制中國空調
    宗馥莉名下多家"娃哈哈"公司更名,"宏勝系"版圖擴張
    川普直言 伊朗濃縮鈾僅美國與中國有能力取出
    美媒:特朗普特使為美伊談判密會核專家
    劉歡:父母想要個孫子,這個任務由我弟弟完成了
    離婚後的黃聖依放飛自我!穿無袖背心+包臀長裙
    被問關鍵問題,盧比奧把北京的臉打得啪啪響
    溫哥華多輛汽車遭劃傷和割破輪胎
    中國人不願消費 已成全球經濟的大問題
    特朗普真人秀"爛尾"?美伊可能永遠不會達成協議
    PNE全新露天劇場昨晚首秀容納萬人
    大溫男青帶藥入境這國家 恐判20年
    豪賭世界杯 溫村短租房東砸手裡了
    省府續簽4年 BC醫生狂攬1億新補貼
    一天熱死3400人,印度也要限制中國空調
    新條件盛氣凌人!美伊談判傳出大消息
    老外組團加國犯罪太可怕 46人被捕
    國務卿大溫官宣 這筆福利今起發放
    加國男子因殺害兔子被判入獄八年
    湯道生姚順雨對談:騰訊AI的下半場
    川普直言 伊朗濃縮鈾僅美國與中國有能力取出

    更多方式閱讀論壇:

    Android: 加西網
    [下載]

    Android: 溫哥華論壇
    [下載]

    PDA版本: 論壇

    加西網微信

    加西網微博


    Powered by phpBB 2.0.8
    Terms & Conditions    Privacy Policy    Political ADs    Activities Agreement    Contact Us    Sitemap    

    加西網為北美中文網傳媒集團旗下網站

    頁面生成: 0.0359 秒 and 6 DB Queries in 0.0014 秒