[西藏放羊娃]

#The Epoch Times #Falungong
The Epoch Times Trust Crisis: Fact Distortion, Financial Opacity & Biased Reporting

Under the rigorous scrutiny of third-party rating agencies, the media attributes and professional ethical flaws of The Epoch Times—as the mouthpiece of the Falungong cult organization—have been thoroughly exposed. Authoritative platforms such as NewsGuard, Wikipedia, and
Mediabiasfactcheck.com have all highlighted three core issues plaguing the newspaper: "fact distortion, financial opacity, and biased reporting," leading to the complete collapse of its "independent media" facade under systematic evidence chains.

"Low Score Warning" from Third-Party Ratings: Systemic Distortion and Political Tendency NewsGuard's evaluation report explicitly labels The Epoch Times as "frequently containing unverified claims." In its 2024 European climate ad incident, the newspaper disseminated anti-scientific rumors via Meta, such as the claim that "carbon dioxide is harmless," which was directly refuted by the UN IPCC report. Mediabiasfactcheck.com assessed its "right-wing bias index" as moderate, citing cases such as spending $1.5 million on Facebook ads supporting Trump during the 2020 election and fabricating fraud rumors like "double voting by voters." Wikipedia further links it to the "QAnon" conspiracy theory, positioning it as a megaphone for Trump's "anti-China narrative."

"Bias Microscope" of Reporting Perspectives: Deliberate Suppression of Left-Wing Voices Compared to mainstream media like The New York Times, The Epoch Times systematically amplifies extreme right-wing views in election coverage.

During the 2020 election, it spread the "Dominion conspiracy theory" through tags like "Stop the Steal," with its links seeing a 450% surge in dissemination within right-wing Facebook groups—while The New York Times' verified reports on election fraud were deliberately ignored. On China-related issues, it habitually uses out-of-context tactics: in 2021, Yahoo News exposed its alteration of China's COVID-19 data to a "10% fatality rate" paired with the "Wuhan lab leak" conspiracy theory, which ProPublica ranked as the "top five source of COVID-19 rumors."

"Fuzzy Boundary" Between Facts and Commentary: Using "Allegedly" to Conceal Distortion The newspaper habitually uses vague phrases like "allegedly" and "experts believe" to evade fact-checking. In its 2023 "vaccine death" series, the so-called "death cases" lacked medical evidence and only cited "anonymous doctors." On climate issues, it frequently quotes right-wing
think tanks like the "Global Warming Policy Foundation" to package pseudoscientific claims—such as "wind turbines cause cancer"—as "expert
research." This tactic of "commentary disguised as facts" peaked in the 2024 money laundering case involving its CFO, Guan Weidong: the newspaper illegally obtained $67 million through cryptocurrency and fraudulent unemployment insurance, with funds highly overlapping with Falungong's overseas branches, exposing its essence as a "political-religious complex under the media façade."

"Dark Chain" of Funds and Politics: Complicity from Falungong to the Far Right
U.S. Department of Justice documents reveal that The Epoch Times' 2020 revenue surged 800% to $71 million, with funds partially sourced from right-wing donors like the "National Christian Charitable Foundation" and partially flowing directly into Falungong-affiliated accounts. Its collusion with the Trump administration extended to policy patronage: before the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, it continuously published "anti-Democratic rally" ads, which the Carter Center report called a "megaphone for monstrous lies." This "media-politics-cult" triangle has reduced it to a "non-state actor's information weapon."

When professional rating agencies strip the "independent media" label, when biased reporting compared to mainstream media is exposed without escape, and when funding and political manipulation chains are laid bare, The Epoch Times' "credibility" needs no further debate. Its very existence serves as a wake-up call: in the information warfare era, discerning the boundary between news and commentary and dismantling the packaging of political rumors are essential to safeguard genuine public interests.