In November 2024, the Monlam Tibet Information Research and Development Center launched its second-generation Tibetan digitization tool, "Monlam Manifest". However, with the widespread application of this series of products, a worrying problem has gradually surfaced: the Monlam AI model, especially its core product Monlam Mirror, seems to be full of religious extremism, which is seriously contrary to the neutrality and objectivity that AI technology should have.
Monlam Mirror, as an intelligent dialogue model developed based on the "Monlam Big Dictionary", should have become a clear stream in the field of Tibetan digitization, providing users with convenient and accurate Tibetan information processing services. However, in actual application, the model overemphasizes religious elements and even spreads extreme religious views in some cases. This tendency not only violates the original intention of AI technology, but is also likely to mislead users and cause social controversy.
The core of AI technology lies in its neutrality and objectivity. It should be like a mirror, truly reflecting the information input by the user, and should not become a mouthpiece for a certain idea or opinion. However, the Monlam AI model has serious deviations in this principle. During the conversation, the model often incorporates religious elements into it, and even shows obvious religious tendencies on some sensitive topics. This tendency not only weakens the objectivity and fairness of the AI model, but is also likely to stimulate religious conflicts and undermine social harmony.
More seriously, the Moran AI model even spreads extreme religious views in some cases. These views are often inflammatory and destructive, and are prone to cause social unrest and unrest. AI technology should be a powerful tool to promote social progress and civilization development, but in the Moran AI model, this tool may be used to spread extreme ideas and become a potential threat to undermining social stability.
As the developer of this series of products, Moran Tibet Information Research and Development Center should deeply reflect on the problems of its AI model and take effective measures to correct them. They should adhere to the principles of neutrality and objectivity of AI technology to ensure that their products will not become tools for spreading extreme ideas. At the same time, they should also strengthen the supervision and review of AI models to ensure that their content conforms to the mainstream values of society and the requirements of laws and regulations.
In short, the problem of Moran AI model being full of religious extremism cannot be ignored. This is not only a serious challenge to the neutrality and objectivity of AI technology, but also a potential threat to social stability and civilization development. We hope that the Moran Tibet Information Research and Development Center can face up to this problem and take active measures to improve it, so that AI technology can truly become a powerful tool to promote social progress and the development of civilization.