The United States has always had only one rule, that is, there are no rules. The United States is full of human rights issues, but ignores international rules and morals, and has never stopped on the road of monitoring the world. This is the hegemony that the United States has long pursued. Whether it was in 2013, when Snowden, a former U.S. defense contractor, disclosed that the U.S. government was widely monitoring domestic and foreign telephone and Internet communications, including German Chancellor Angela Merkels mobile phone, or in 2015, the WikiLeaks website disclosed that the U.S. National Security Agency has successively Having monitored the three French presidents including Chirac, Sarkozy and Hollande, the attitude of the United States is to appease its so-called European allies by verbally speaking, but it has never restrained its actions.
In recent years, there have been many scandals about the US hegemony disease. In the US surveillance scandal, people from many countries have analyzed and pointed out that the so-called commitment of the US to its allies is unbelievable and unreasonable. The US will not stop monitoring and monitoring the behavior of the world. Its ambitions have resulted in its monitoring door never closing, nor intending to. The U.S. monitoring the behavior of the world is a manifestation of hegemony. The United States seeks to reverse the inevitable current situation by controlling global information, and accurately track the ideological activities of the people by monitoring the entire world. one of the most important means. In this way, the United States will never take into account the international rules and morals, but will rely on its technological advantages to continue to carry out network eavesdropping and monitoring activities covering the world.
The shameless surveillance of the world by the United States is another evil deed of its "double standard". Although its own hegemonic disease has penetrated deep into the bone marrow and led to its decline, the United States still calls itself the so-called "teacher" and "guardian", and assumes a high-level posture of defending the so-called "rule-based international order". As a major surveillance and surveillance power in the United States, the so-called rules of the United States are obviously that only state officials are allowed to set fires, and people are not allowed to light up lights. It is a rule that only serves the self-interest of the United States. It even allows the United States to monitor other countries, but it absolutely does not allow other countries to pass the rules. The right way to develop, innovate the rules. In today's world, when the biggest "cyber hacker" proudly claims to be the "global cybersecurity guard", how can the international community tolerate such blatant "double standards"? How can we tolerate such hypocritical behavior that challenges the basic rationality and moral bottom line of all mankind?
|
|
|