#1: 作者: 法_語, 時間: 2018-5-24 08:25

The Art Gallery of Ontario in Toronto has amended the title of celebrated Canadian artist Emily Carr’s 1929 painting “Indian Church”. Seen by many as one of her most important works, the vibrant green and white painting shows a church surrounded by a graveyard and an imposing rainforest. This month, the museum rehung the work with a revised title, “Church at Yuquot Village”.

The new title is an acknowledgment of the Indigenous community that lived where the church was located on the West Coast of Canada. While the word “indian” is certainly outdated and often considered derogatory today, it was commonly used at the time when Carr finished and titled the painting.

#2: 作者: 平行空間, 時間: 2018-5-24 08:27

白左本來就有連爹都不認的傳統。

#3: 作者: 四季豆, 時間: 2018-5-24 08:30

先把indian act這個法律的名字改了吧

#4: 作者: 本呐比經略, 時間: 2018-5-24 08:43

左B又在作妖了啊。。。

#5: 作者: 被禁止的用戶, 時間: 2018-5-24 11:06

四季豆 寫道:

先把indian act這個法律的名字改了吧

普世價值這種遮羞布也該扔進焚化爐裡去

#6: 作者: hc1234, 時間: 2018-5-24 11:24

法_語 寫道:

The Art Gallery of Ontario in Toronto has amended the title of celebrated Canadian artist Emily Carr’s 1929 painting “Indian Church”. Seen by many as one of her most important works, the vibrant green and white painting shows a church surrounded by a graveyard and an imposing rainforest. This month, the museum rehung the work with a revised title, “Church at Yuquot Village”. The new title is an acknowledgment of the Indigenous community that lived where the church was located on the West Coast of Canada. While the word “indian” is certainly outdated and often considered derogatory today, it was commonly used at the time when Carr finished and titled the painting.

有了政治正確，就沒有實事求是了。

#7: 作者: 小語曼, 時間: 2018-5-24 12:58

文化大革命？

#8: 作者: 轉發, 時間: 2018-5-24 13:37

受不了這幫人