#1: 作者: chowder, 时间: 2012-9-02 17:17

此帖承接:

www.westca.com/Forums/...ml#3689315

加拿大能源巨擘英桥公司计划投资55亿元兴建北方门户油管计划一直受到争议。
上周一份有关英桥公司在美国密西根油管漏油事件的报告出炉,显示该公司在事前防范与事后处理的方式都有问题。

省新民主党(BCNDP)已表态反对

卑诗省长简蕙芝对英桥公司(Enbridge Energy)所提的「北方门户油管」(Northern Gateway pipeline)计划不愿表态。简蕙芝强调,「北方门户油管」计画可能存在风险,但可为本省带来庞大利益,正因风险与机会并存才须经过法定程序讨论,让正反意见获得充分讨论。

van.worldjournal.com/v...%E6%85%8B?

#2: 作者: 豆包106, 时间: 2012-9-02 17:50

无论咋样,希望BC省油价能到美国的水平。

#3: 作者: election, 时间: 2012-9-04 01:39

加拿大恩桥公司(Enbridge)在周五表示,他们将改进北方门户油管(Northern Gateway)的设计,以对卑诗省原住民对油管计划的反对心态做出反应。

据来自卡尔加利的报导表示,恩桥将在该输油管设计上利用最新设备,以降低油管漏油的危险。
报导显示,新设计包括在油管接近河流和其他水源的地段使用特别厚的油管,以防漏油或油管破裂。
而恩桥也表示,他们将加强定期审核油管安全程度的支出,并多雇用进行审核的人员。
据恩桥透露,新油管设计将提升建筑项目的预算大约加币＄5亿元
taiyangbao.ca/business...nt=zh-hans

#4: 作者: election, 时间: 2012-9-04 01:45

BC Greens do not support the Enbridge Pipeline under any conditions

The BC Liberals laid out conditions their government will impose before heavy oil pipelines are approved. The five conditions sounded like tacit approval for the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline. The BC Conservatives support the pipeline under similar conditions. The BC NDP is opposed to the pipeline and are consulting lawyers to see if the project can be stopped if approved by the Joint Review Panel.

“BC Greens oppose the Northern Gateway project,” says Leader Jane Sterk. “The pipeline and the accompanying tanker traffic along BC’s wild and fragile coast cannot be justified under any circumstance.
“Our position is grounded in the need to transition off fossil fuels, not enable unsustainable expansion. There is no condition under which we see a benefit to BC.

“Enbridge does not have the required social license to operate in BC. Their record of spills on existing pipelines, their inability to respond when spills occur and the inadequacy of clean up efforts should eliminate them from any consideration.

“Greens believe in decentralized decision-making whereby local rather than provincial or federal support would determine the approval of resource development. Approval would be grounded in cumulative impacts. The prime benefits of the projects need to accrue to local communities and the surrounding region.

“A BC Green government would say no to the Northern Gateway Pipeline. We stand with the overwhelming majority of presenters to the Joint Review Panel who are saying no at each of the community hearings. We stand with the majority of British Columbians who reject this project for precautionary reasons.

“As Terry Lake indicated, BC’s opportunity to say no comes with the need to issue permits for hundreds of land crossings. Most British Columbians believe BC and its citizens have a right to determine what happens in the province. The permitting process represents that right.

“BC Greens remain hopeful that the Joint Review Panel will reject the Northern Gateway Pipeline. But if it approves the project, or if the Harper Conservatives override a no by the National Energy Board, BC Greens would protect British Columbians right to say an unequivocal no,” concludes Sterk.

#5: 作者: election, 时间: 2012-9-04 01:52

斗起来了!

B.C., Alberta premiers clash over Gateway pipeline revenue

The fight between the premiers of B.C. and Alberta over how to divide the revenues from Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway pipeline is quickly heating even before the $5.5 billion project has approval to go ahead.

B.C. Premier Christy Clark told CBC Radio on Tuesday morning that the province will only approve the project if it gets its fair share of the revenue from the proposed crude oil pipeline, in order to compensate the province for taking on the majority of the environmental risk.
"Alberta's interests in this are pretty obvious. Alberta gets the large bulk of the benefits, takes very little of the risk. B.C. takes most of the risk and we get very few of the benefits. So I think it's pretty obvious that we have some talking to do here," said Clark.
But Alberta Premier Alison Redford said Clark is simply pitting one province against another, rather than doing what is best for Canada as a whole.

B.C. Premier Christy Clark says B.C. needs a greater share of the revenue from the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline. (CBC)

"We will not share royalties and I see nothing else proposed and would not be prepared to consider anything else at this time," Redford said in Edmonton on Tuesday morning.
"It's not how Canada has worked. It's not how Canada has succeeded, and I'm disappointed to hear the comments."
Redford said she was not interested in cutting a deal with B.C. and suggested the province would have to look to the federal government for a transfer payment if it wanted a larger share of the pipeline revenue.

Alberta Premier Alison Redford has dismissed B.C.'s demands for a greater share of revenue from the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline. (CBC)"We have in our provinces the right to income from resources. We have Confederation, which allows for people in each province to benefit from the resources they have to retain jurisdiction over those resources, and then to be part of federal system that allows for transfer payments," said Redford.
"Leadership is not about dividing Canadians and pitting one province against another. Leadership is about working together. That’s when our country benefits, that’s when Canada leads," Redford also said in statement issued on Monday.

'Troubling precedent,' says Saskatchewan premier.Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall echoed Redford's concerns, saying cutting B.C. a share of the royalties would set a "troubling precedent," especially for landlocked provinces that have no ports to get their exports to foreign markets.
"This is the thin edge of a very big wedge," Wall told CBC News Network's Power and Politics on Tuesday.

"You can't just say look we only want to do this in the case of bitumen. What about the rail transport of other minerals? Or perhaps ... potentially dangerous chemicals that are manufactured in other parts of Canada and shipped across?"
The three premiers are expected to meet in Halifax this week, but Alberta's strong reaction to B.C.'s proposal on Monday could lead to some tension in the room when the premiers begin their talks on Thursday.
Redford was hoping to use this week's meeting of the Council of the Federation in Halifax to garner widespread support for her proposed national energy strategy. She talked up the idea with other western premiers at their meeting in late May, but Clark did not attend that gathering.
Enbridge spokesman Todd Nogier called the debate over revenue an "opportunity," but said the existing deal would already give B.C. tangible benefits.
"The tax revenue that would flow to the B.C. government would be $1.2 billion over the course of 30 years. There will be about 560 to 600 full-time jobs, good-paying full-time permanent positions," said Nogier

Under the current terms, B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake said Monday that British Columbia would get only eight per cent of the pipeline revenue while assuming 100 per cent of the marine risk for the port terminal and tanker traffic on the West Coast, and 58 per cent of the land-based risk for the pipeline.



www.cbc.ca/news/canada...eline.html

#6: 作者: election, 时间: 2012-9-04 02:11

早干吗去了,当初返回HST的17亿(?是不是这个数字,记得不确切了)给联邦时不是很爽快吗?

看来选情真是吃紧呵;肉也真肥!

HALIFAX British Columbia Premier Christy Clark said Friday that she couldn’t sign onto a national energy strategy before resolving a dispute over the Northern Gateway pipeline.
Clark stepped out of meetings at the Council of the Federation in Halifax to make the announcement as premiers worked to cobble together a pan-Canadian strategy on energy.
She said she wouldn’t endorse a deal before discussions take place with Ottawa and Alberta over how B.C. would be compensated for allowing the $5.5-billion pipeline to transit through the province.
“British Columbia will not be participating in any of those discussions until after we’ve seen some progress that our requirements for the shipment of heavy oil will be met,” she told a hastily called news conference.
It’s not a national energy strategy if B.C. hasn‘t signed
Clark said she and Alberta Premier Alison Redford had a “very frank discussion” about it Friday morning, but didn’t reveal details or if they planned on holding further talks on the matter.
Clark has said she decided to ask for an unspecified share of royalties and revenues after doing analysis on the pipeline, which will move bitumen from Alberta to the B.C. coast for shipment to Asia.
Her government has released five conditions she says need to be met before she can move forward with plans for the pipeline. In addition to the demand for a greater portion of the economic benefits, they include the completion of an environmental review now underway, assurances that the “best” responses will be available for potential spills on land and at sea and recognition of aboriginal rights on the land.
Clark repeated her claim that the province bears too much risk from oil spills at sea or on land, while receiving only eight per cent in tax benefits.
She added another wrinkle to the feud when she called on Ottawa on Wednesday to sit down with her and Redford to hash out the issue. Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird weighed in on the dispute, questioning Clark’s stance and reiterating the federal government’s support for the project.
Redford has flatly dismissed Clark’s position as one that would “fundamentally change Confederation” because it would mean new negotiations for projects throughout the country.

According to research in an application filed by Enbridge (TSX:ENB), 8.2 per cent of the Northern Gateway’s projected $81 billion tax revenue would flow to B.C. over a 30-year period. That equates to $6.7 billion for B.C., while Ottawa is expected to receive $36 billion and Alberta would earn $32 billion.
Saskatchewan is expected to top the remainder of the provinces in terms of tax benefit, receiving about $4 billion.
Enbridge’s proposed 1,177-kilometre twin line would carry heavy oil from Alberta across a vast swath of pristine B.C. wilderness and First Nations territory to a port at Kitimat, B.C., for shipment to Asia.
Last week, the company announced it will shore up another $500 million in safety improvements

Read more: www.theprovince.com/ne...z21peK8f1H

#7: 作者: election, 时间: 2012-9-05 06:15

总部在卡加利的英桥(Enbridge)公司旗下的油管在美国威斯康辛州又发生漏油事件,美国当局已介入调查污染情况。英桥公司提议在卑省兴建北方门户输油管计画的前景,进一步蒙上阴影。
英桥公司输美油管在威州麦迪森(Madison)以北的大沼泽(Grand Marsh)输油段,7月27日发现多达19万公升原油外洩。该段名为Lakehead的输油管线从加境输送轻油到芝加哥地区的炼油厂提炼。

美国联邦交通部油管暨危险质材安全署28日表示,已经介入调查油管出问题的原因,并派遣专家到油污现场勘查。

英桥公司发言人则发出声明中指出,英桥将以处理该事件的善后为最优先目标,目前已暂时关闭输油段的管线系统,原油外洩区域已被控制。该公司称,油管洩漏的原因仍不明,也未清楚何时油管能恢复启用。

这次漏油事件对冲击英桥公司油管未来的重要开发计画而言,无异于雪上加霜。两年前2010年该公司旗下另一条油管在密西根州漏油,2万桶原油流入当地卡拉玛祖河(Kalamazoo River)支流,曾引起轩然大波,美国方面和环保人士对油污威胁的反感记忆犹新,早前更公开指英桥当时处理油污不当。

英桥当时延误了18小时,才关闭出事的油管,危机处理机制的「螺丝鬆」了,被各界严厉批评。后来,美国当局对英桥判罚370万元。

van.worldjournal.com/v...=bc_story1

#8: 作者: election, 时间: 2012-9-05 06:18

卑诗促提高获利比率

卑诗早前就输油管计划提出5项要求,强调本省承担大部分潜在漏油风险,却仅获取8%的利益,故简蕙芝督促Enbridge公司需抱持公平原则,提高本省获利比率,弥补漏油风险可能带来的环境及经济损失,包括共享现归阿省所有的资源特许权及税收,但阿省省长雷福德(Alison Redford)并不答应。

在昨日举行的最后一日联邦谘议会上,简蕙芝在会议讨论到全国能源策略期间,以离场的举动向公众传达强硬态度,即拒绝签署雷福德极力赞成的国家能源策略,至争端解决为止,令两省利益之战进一步升温。

阿省指资源特许权不能改

简蕙芝表示她必须通过此举来为本省作「有意义」的争取,因能源策略必须获得13省一致通过才能实行。

雷福德说她愿意与简蕙芝进一步讨论,但资源特许权的所有权不可能改变,本省的5项要求史无前例,恐破坏联邦谘议会规则;她暗示如矛盾继续无改变,有效的政治协商亦不会实现。

而在本省退出的情况下,加拿大其余12省将不得不重新商讨能源策略新程序。

www.mingpaovan.com/htm...8/vasb.htm

#9: 作者: election, 时间: 2012-9-05 06:25

加国第二富翁大卫.铃木通过基金会表态:一次事故足以使BC灭顶

卑诗省长 Christie Clark和亚省省长 AlisonRedford 本周齐齐在 Halifax 参加全国省长大会,但会议未开始两位西部省长已经就北方门户输油管计划显得针锋双对.
卑诗省长 Christie Clark 虽然没有出席本周一由省环境厅长TerryLake 召开有关省府对于兴建北方门户输油管计划的立场,不过到今日, 省长Christie Clark 已成为这个议题的发言人.
Clark 指出, 没有卑诗省的同意兴建北方门户输油管计划将胎死腹中!
但如果亚省能够对于卑诗省提出合理经济回报, 省府才会作出考虑.

照省昨日公布的立场, 卑诗省府要求以下五项条件:
1首先,国家能源局的联合审查小组必定要通过兴建北方门户输油管计划.
2设立国际水平海洋漏油应对,防止及处理系统.
3原住民的法律权益及条约权利必定要得到正视.同时第一民族必定要得到足够资讯,参与和分享利益的机会.
4卑诗省必定要分享到公平的经济利益来平衡卑诗省民,
5省府和省天然环境在兴建北方门户输油管计划所面对的风险.

对于以上五点立场, 我们大卫铃木基金会已在各中文传媒公开表达了我们的立场 –
照基金会行政总裁 Peter Robinson 指出,
卑诗北部水域是一个独特的天然环境. 当这个水域和地域受到油污损毁, 更多的金钱亦不可能作出补救. 很多朋友都听过.Exxon Valdez 在 1989 年在亚拉斯加水域沉没. 数到今天已经有超过 20年, 但区内的天然损害到今天还未完全清晰.以Exxon Valdez在亚拉斯加水域的例子, 要设立一个现实的金额来抵偿风险根本就是不设实际的想法.资料显示,Exxon Valdez 当年的赔偿金额高达 $3.4 billion (三十四亿元.) 但如果卑诗水域出油污意外, 以北方门户而言, 商业的最高赔偿金额只有大约 $1.3 billion(十三亿元.) 意思是卑诗省民将要负担沉重责任,因为水上油污卑诗的责任是 100%!
以大卫铃木基金会的立场, 省府目前应该向联邦政府进行游说, 设定全国能源政策, 把国家资源多面化投资.让年青一代有机会向研发再生能源方向进军.
基金会始创人 Dr. David Suzuki 今早亦透过电话表示,
省长Christie Clark 似乎就输油管问题依然未能看清整个情况.
事实是卑诗省和加国都必定向前进. 建输油管是向后退的做法,
绝对不是有效的全国能源策略, 更不要说订出赔偿金额 – 因为这个不单是天价,
以建油管对开水域 Hecate Straight 而言其实是无价宝.
再者, 省府昨日同时公布的 52页技术报告明显己经表态– Enbridge公司提出的 $5.5 billion (55 亿元) 北方门户输油管计划等于 Hecate Straight水域在未来的 10至20年都会每年有220首超级油轮航行.而报告指区内天然环境之脆弱可以被形容为一次意外足以至命!


至于省长 Christie Clark 的经济回报提意, 亚省省长昨曰已经第一时间作出回应, 而答案是 NO, 不会考虑!
事实上, 卑诗省府在本周提出五点立场的同时亦提出了一份五十二页的油管技术评沽报告,
而结论是卑诗省的天然环境和水域无法经得起漏油风险.
就连有名温哥华太阳报专栏作者Vaughn Palmer 都表示不明白省长 Christie Clark为何还要和亚省省长参与拉锯战.以卑诗省和加拿大全国的利益, 兴建油管连接亚省油沙到亚洲对卑诗省民和加国国民都没有利益,
因为油管漏油是必然的恶梦. 但联邦和省目前都没有技术, 资源, 甚至法律能力作有效补救.意思时当出现海上或陆上漏油事故, 卑诗省省民和加国纳税人就要背起天文数字的补救工作.而事实上, 天然环境受严重损毁, 金钱是否可以作出补救呢?

taiyangbao.ca/topnews/...nt=zh-hans

#10: 作者: 花落花开, 时间: 2012-9-05 06:31

阿选辛苦，谢谢这些好资料好东西！