#1: 作者: 春月, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:05

今天稍微看了一下案件的細節。 感覺川普律師團隊的訴求挺奇葩的。

To sum up this case. The argument is that because two voters (the plaintiffs) did not get to cure their votes, their votes did not get counted therefore all votes in Pennsylvania need to be tossed. The judge pointed out the correct remedy would be to allow the two votes to be counted instead of trashing 7 million votes. An analogy I saw someone else make is Trump's legal team is arguing that if the defendant damaged my car the remedy is not to have the car fixed but to have the defendant damage all of the cars in Pennsylvania. Further Trump's team is arguing that the votes for president are unconstitutional and illegitimate but the votes for all of the down ballot candidates are legal and should be counted. So the same act is both unconstitutional and constitutional at the same time. Finally the original complaint is that Democratic counties allowed their voters to cure their ballots , but that Republican counties did not even though the Secretary of the State of Pennsylvania told all counties that they could help their respective voters to cure the ballot. So the Judge also wondered why the Republican Counties were not being sued since they are the ones that disenfranchised the voters by not allowing them to cure their votes. So is anyone crossing their fingers that the Appeals Court will over turn the judgement.

#2: 作者: 春月, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:11

而且， 川普律師團隊並沒有上訴要求高院推翻賓州法院的裁決。 而只是要求高院告訴地方法官， 允許他們在地方法院修改起訴案件的訴求。
之前， 賓州法院的法官煩了他們老是把訴求改來改去， 所以不允許他們改了。 現在他們上訴要求允許他們改。


An expedited review means we'll have a decision by the end of the week. By the way, before you get too excited, the Trump Campaign is NOT asking the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the Pennsylvania election result. Read the last 3 paragraphs of the article. The Trump campaign is simply appealing on the basis that the lower Court did not allow the Trump Campaign to amend their complaint. The Trump campaign is only asking the Third Circuit to send the matter back down to the lower court to have another hearing based on an amended complaint.

Trump's argument on appeal is basically that it was "unfair" of the district court judge not to allow backsies and undo amendments to the complaint, FILED BY THE TRUMP LEGAL TEAM, which narrowed the scope thereof (eliminating 5 of the 7 counts).The judge did not take too kindly to Trump's wasting time by repeatedly flip-flopping both legal counsel and legal arguments. As a result, the judge denied the second amendment to the complaint and dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice.

#3: 作者: 男人你懂的, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:21

世上最怕認真二字，樓主威武。

#4: 作者: 春月, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:25

總結一下 ，他們的訴求就是。 因為有兩張投川普的票填的不規范， 也沒有被允許修改， 被剔除出去了沒有算進結果， 法官的建議是那就把這兩張票也算進去， 但川普律師不同意，要求把賓州的700萬票都要宣布作廢。

#5: 作者: 本那比的經略, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:27

男人你懂的 寫道:

世上最怕認真二字，樓主威武。

的確威武，一個幾近法盲的貨去評價專業律師，還有比這更搞笑的嗎？

#6: 作者: 春月, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:27

男人你懂的 寫道:

世上最怕認真二字，樓主威武。

所以， 他的律師團隊就是在庭外敢囂張。 進了法庭在法官面前馬上就老實了。

#7: 作者: 慎獨, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:29

樓主受累

發完英文，還得幫那幫人總結翻譯

#8: 作者: 春月, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:30

本那比的經略 寫道:

男人你懂的 寫道: 世上最怕認真二字，樓主威武。 的確威武，一個幾近法盲的貨去評價專業律師，還有比這更搞笑的嗎？

呵呵， 川普的專業律師已經是全美國的笑話了。

這可不是我說的， 川普的前盟友說的。

你信不信由你。 我信了， 不行嗎？

#9: 作者: 本那比的經略, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:31

春月 寫道:

呵呵， 川普的專業律師已經是全美國的笑話了。 這可不是我說的， 川普的前盟友說的。 你信不信由你。 我信了， 不行嗎？

那你就信唄，誰也攔不住。。。

#10: 作者: 男人你懂的, 時間: 2020-11-24 17:38

慎獨 寫道:

樓主受累 發完英文，還得幫那幫人總結翻譯

說到點子上了，造謠污蔑的成本太低，認真對待真相的人太苦。
加西這幫川粉，舔著臉叫囂民主自由，卻沒有實事求是的態度，丟人。