快把那個破口罩摘了吧

樓主 / 剪剪舞隨風

因為你本來就已經有免疫力了

瑞典的實例證明：新冠病毒的群體免疫力是10％－20％，不是70％。
就是說人群的10％－20％人感染過了，病毒就沒有路可走了。因為80％的人天生自帶免疫力。

The Herd Immunity Threshold (“HIT”) for COVID-19 is between 10-20%

事實證明: 俺是對的，新冠病毒就是一個大流感。

福奇這個大騙子，去死吧

www.zerohedge.com/poli...-after-all

贊

花籃

投訴

踩

第 2 樓 / 剪剪舞隨風

81％的人天生自帶免疫力。

“Scientists are now showing evidence that up to 81% of us can mount a strong response to COVID-19 without ever having been exposed toit before:

Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell epitopes revealed preexisting T-cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals, and validation of similarity to common cold human coronaviruses provided a functional basis for postulated heterologous immunity.

This alone could explain WHY the Herd Immunity Threshold (HIT) is so much lower for COVID-19 than some scientists thought originally, when the number being talked about was closer to 70%. Many of us have always been immune!“

贊

花籃

投訴

踩

第 3 樓 / 冰冰桑

我就不怎麼帶口罩

贊

花籃

投訴

踩

第 4 樓 / 剪剪舞隨風

As the author points out, we should have known from the incident on the Diamond Princess (Cruise Liner) that immunity was far more widespread than previously thought. Readers might recall that only 17%of the people on board tested Covid-positive, “despite an ideal environment for mass spread, implying 83% of the people were somehow protected from the new virus.”

Think about that for a minute. All of the passengers were 60 years old or older, but only 17% caught the virus. Why?

Immunity, that’s why. What else could it be? Cross immunity, natural immunity, or SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immunity. Whatever you want to call it,it exists and it explains why the vast majority of people will not get the highly-contagious Covid no matter what they do.

贊

花籃

投訴

踩