空間首頁 | 博客 | 好友分享 | 日記 | 存檔 | 朋友和群組 | 個人資料
文章內容
By   

Schlain states: "From an evolutionary point of view, homosexuality is a supreme paradox." If it had a genetic cause the trait would quickly go extinct. However, throughout history the rate of homosexuality has remained essentially constant, about 3% for males and 1% for females. It appears in all human societies.

The Proposed Root Cause

It is clear to me that our sexual attraction preferences are genetically carried. They are not learned after birth. However, our genes contain two distinctly different sexual attraction programs. One is for females insuring they are attracted to males, and the other is for males insuring they are attracted to females. Both options are available at conception. A selection is made during the development of the fetus. As Schlain states: "The female is the default mode for all mammalian fetuses". We all start out as females. At approximately six weeks after conception a male's budding testes will begin secreting large amounts of testosterone. This shifts the developmental sequence towards a male. When the testosterone secretion does not take place, all the fetuses even those with the male Y chromosome, will develop into females. This is the stage where the different developmental sequences between male and female are set in motion. Subsequent male and female features arise from common anatomic precursors that have the potential to develop into either sex. For example, the tissue destined to become the clitoris in the female will become a penis in a male. Since both options are genetically available, a selection process is taking place. This process selects which part of the genetic code will be expressed and which will be suppressed. Included in this are the genetically carried codes for sexual attraction. At the appropriate stage of development, the sexual attraction program is selected irreversibly. It is as irreversible as the selection between a clitoris and penis. It is not clear exactly what stage this particular selection happens. It is only clear that it does happen. This is the point where an error is made for homosexuals. The inappropriate program is selected.

At this point I revert to being a chemist. All developmental processes are chemical processes/reactions. The selection mechanism is a chemical process composed of a set of chemical reactions. Basically there is a chemical switch that is thrown and the program is selected.

As a chemist, I know that there is no such thing as a chemical reaction that has 100% yield of the preferred product. This is a fundamental prediction of thermodynamics. The yield is always less than 100%. Thus, when it is time for the chemical reactions to select the sexual attraction program, one would expect, from a simple chemical argument, that some fraction would not go the appropriate way. From the observations on the ongoing fraction of gay births, one would conclude that the reaction has about a 97% yield for males and a 99% yield for females. The remaining 3% males and 1% females are destined to be homosexual. Thus, homosexuality has a statistical, chemical yield cause. They are homosexual at birth but there is nothing unusual about their genetic makeup because it does not have a genetic cause. They can have the same fraction of normal children as non-gay people. As far as I know, I believe they do.

It is obviously absurd to judge homosexuals morally.

Is this particular form of perfection concept supportable? He had to believe it was a key factor in explaining his recognized, exceptional creative genius. Is it a reasonable premise in general? In support of this, Shlain presents a partial list of others: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Tchaikovsky, Newton, Milton, Michelangelo and Nietzche to name a few. We just have to look around us in our present society. On average, gays seem to possess exceptional aesthetic and creative abilities. They have made their mark not only in the arts and literature, but also in architecture, music, religion, science, mathematics and many other fields. Shlain states: "They fill a special niche in society and human culture would be considerably grayer and less sumptuous without them".

www.krysalis.net/homosexuality.htm
 
點擊: 0 | 評論: 3 | 分類: 那人那事 | 論壇: 溫哥華不眠夜 | 論壇帖子
分享:
二維碼

文章評論

剪剪舞隨風
無題
那些反對同性戀的男同鞋,在反對之前要想好,你在你媽肚子裡的頭6個星期,你可是個女的。

2011-05-27 20:53:16 | 引用
無題
Da Vinci, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Tchaikovsky, Newton, Milton, Michelangelo and Nietzche 這些傑出的人物都是GAY。

2011-05-28 16:19:03 | 引用
剪剪舞隨風
snow2009
Re: 3% 和 1%
這個華女的一生被自己銷毀了
子不教 父之過

尊重法治
保護自己


寫道:
18歲同性戀大學生自殺震驚美國

羅格斯大學目前僅知Molly Wei已被釋放。但是,學校系統中查不到有關她的信息,因此她可能已被停學

上周六,羅格斯大學美式足球賽開始之前,也有賽前沉默來紀念克萊蒙泰。

上周五,校園中許多學生身著黑衣,或系上黑布,表達對克萊蒙泰的哀悼。對於這起隱私被侵犯憤而自盡的悲劇,該校學生都感到震驚,他們呼吁校園中每一個人,都應對他人有更多尊重和理解。也呼吁這樣的尊重能延伸到整個社會,避免類似悲劇再度發生。

2011-05-28 16:52:08 | 引用

發表評論


 
站點公告

剪剪舞隨風

文章分類
情趣生活  
健身唯美  
游山玩水  
原創天地  
美妙音樂  
電影世界  
心靈感悟  
實事政治  
那人那事  
最新日志
口罩P用沒有,測試結果什麼意義都沒有
你將一貧如洗
還是在家休息幸福
中國大使館早關門了
這就是某些人甘願放棄自由的原因
迷上了這個小妹妹
從現在開始到年底
正如我所料
今天的股市歌舞升平
又來了一個好消息
日志搜索
 
站點統計
點擊: 206161
帖子數量: 408
開辟個人空間: 2011-07-29
最後更新: 2020-11-19
快速導航
首頁
論壇
Classified Search Engine
黃頁/二手
北美個人空間
免費注冊
登錄
友情鏈接
此功能已被空間主人關閉
最新到訪
山海
坤朋
十六
虛擬茶客
天蒼蒼
BLM2020
星辰大海
龍江
etcmary
Cleaner
orienty
奶咖啡
 
 
 
 
 

 

加西網為北美中文網傳媒集團旗下網站