http://www.westca.com/Space/u=27183/lang=schinese.html
RSS icon Home icon

    2017年11 月, 美帝开始抓人, 2018 年是大公主, 2019 年会是谁?

  • 文章内容

    2017 年 11 月 何志平

    2018 年 4 月 於比利时 抓 "徐彦军" 拼音

    2018 年 12 月 於加拿大抓 大公主

    2019 年会是谁?


    为何没有人为何志平呜冤?

    外交部一句: 中国政府一向要求企业在国外需合法经营,并遵守当地法律法规.

    何志平幕后老板的能源公司与他撇清关系,外交部对这个热衷于国民外交事业的何志平今天身陷囹圄,也是置身事外,但何在香港出任艺术发展局主席时的一名幕僚陈云,则在面书留言称何是“为国牺牲,愿他平安归来”。



    何志平在案中的身份,是由中国华信能源全资成立的「中华能源基金会(基金会)」秘书长。基金会是联合国一个理事会的「特别谘询非政府组织」,可出席联合国的大小会议和论坛,何志平亦藉此自由进出联合国,与各国领袖及代表接触。本案涉及的乌干达案及乍得案,何志平均通过联合国这个平台搭路,一步一步接触到唡个国家的元首,从而为华信争取商业利益。



    乌干达案

    乌干达案始於2014年9月,乌干达外长库泰萨(Sam Kutesa)当时是联合国大会主席,何志平藉基金会秘书长身份之便,成功接触到他。二人在纽约见过几次面,何起初邀请对方出席基金会活动,但之後就进而为华信,寻求在乌干达投资的机会,範疇包括油田、银行、水力发电及公路铁路,而库泰萨亦同意合作。

    相关新闻:【何志平罪成】煲呔调林郑返港 𥄫实「瞓、食」闻名何志平



    2015年8月库泰萨访港,并获安排与华信主席叶简明会面,叶在会上承诺捐出50万美元,支持库泰萨的妹夫、自1986年一直长踞总统之位的穆塞韦尼(Yoweri Museveni)争取连任,库泰萨亦即垱委任叶简明,为联合国大会「特别荣誉顾问」。



    穆塞韦尼翌年2月成功连任,何志平就指示基金会员工,按库泰萨妻子的指示,将50万美元由香港滙丰银行,汇至一个乌干达基金的户口。该基金名为「食物安全及可持续能源基金」,但地址是律师楼,电话是库泰萨妻的私人公司,有否实际服务成疑。



    乍得案

    乍得案同样在2014年开始,何志平在联合国认识塞内加尔前外长、当时正从事顾问工作的加迪奥(Cheikh Gadio),加迪奥通过其人脉,成功安排何志平及几位华信人员,与乍得总统德比(Idriss Deby)在同年11月会面。双方开门见山讨论乍得一块油田的开採权,虽然会上未有共识,但加迪奥就建议何,向德比提供「不错的经济报酬(nice financial package)」。



    双方一个月後再会面,何志平就带同一个藏有200万美金的礼物盒,送给德比,但德比当垱拒绝,更怒骂「你们是否以为所有非洲领袖都贪污?」在垱的华信人员见狀,就解释款项其实只是捐款。何志平亦在会面後,促加迪奥补写一封电邮,证明款项是捐款;不过加迪奥称,何之後就再无过问「捐款」的用途及下落。



    何志平之後正式委任加迪奥为顾问,并指示基金会员工,以顾问费等名义,向加迪奥在杜拜的顾问公司户口,汇款40万美元,这笔钱亦成为控罪的一部分。加迪奥原本是本案的另一被告,不过早前美国司法部已撤销其控罪,他亦同意指证何志平,将是今次审讯的一个重点证人。



    唡案涉及的贿款高达290万美元,何志平一共被起诉8条罪,包括1项串谋违反《海外反腐败法(Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FCPA)》及4项违反《海外反腐败法》;由於案中汇款均途经美国,何亦被加控1项串谋洗钱及2项洗钱罪。如果全部控罪成立,何最高可被判监禁85年,亦要按案中涉款金额罚款。



    由於控方掌握汇款纪录及大量电邮文件,案中的金钱往来已无事实争议,双方的争辩重点,预料会落在有关款项,到底是「贿款」抑或「捐款」。辩方一度申请将大量「一带一路」资料呈堂,又申请传召熟悉「一带一路」政策的专家证人,希望证明基金会及华信是推动「一带一路」这项国策,捐款支持非洲国家发展,不过有关要求已被法官拒绝。何志平在庭上会如何抗辩,《苹果》将在美国全程直击。

  • 分享:
    二维码

    文章评论

    回音宝宝
    无题
    香港民政事务局前局长何志平涉以200万美元(贿赂中非国家乍得总统,及以50万美元贿赂乌干达外长,被指违反美国的《海外反腐败法》及洗黑钱,过去个多星期,在纽约南区联邦法院审讯。陪审团在纽约时间星期三(12月5日)返回法庭商讨裁决,一致裁定,何志平的八条控罪中,有七条罪成,每条控罪若分开判刑,何志平最高面临65年监禁,而何志平的具体刑期,就要到2019年3月14日判刑。

    何志平聽到判决後,神情哀伤和紧张,之後对记者说「预咗,都係咁」,记者问他有无话对香港人说时,他说「多谢」,之後就返回囚室。他的代表律师称须待判刑程序完成才能提出上诉,现在仍言之过早。曾任检控官的律师分析,根据以往同类案件,估计何志平最终判监一至五年

    2018-12-12 01:03:07 | 引用
    无题
    下一个徐彦军

    中国江苏省国家安全厅的副处长徐彦军(Yanjun Xu,音译),因涉嫌窃取美国航空公司的商业机密及航太机密资料,4月1日在比利时被捕,直至9日由美国联邦调查局(FBI)将他引渡回美国受审。综合外媒报导,美国检方的起诉书直指背後的主谋就是中国政府,暴露了中国官员直接介入对美国的经济间谍活动。

    比利时非常配合美帝, 拘捕到交人只需 9 天

    加拿大效率真的太低了.

    2018-12-12 01:07:07 | 引用
    回音宝宝
    回音宝宝
    无题
    美帝司法部的正式起诉书

    2018 年10 月10 日的

    有兴趣可以看看

    美帝如何"插赃嫁祸"

    2018-12-12 01:09:58 | 引用
    无题
    为了方便大家, 直接贴全文



    Chinese Intelligence Officer Charged with Economic Espionage Involving Theft of Trade Secrets from Leading U.S. Aviation Companies



    A Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS) operative, Yanjun Xu, aka Qu Hui, aka Zhang Hui, has been arrested and charged with conspiring and attempting to commit economic espionage and steal trade secrets from multiple U.S. aviation and aerospace companies.  Xu was extradited to the United States yesterday.

    The charges were announced today by Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio Benjamin C. Glassman, Assistant Director Bill Priestap of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division, and Special Agent in Charge Angela L. Byers of the FBI’s Cincinnati Division.

    “This indictment alleges that a Chinese intelligence officer sought to steal trade secrets and other sensitive information from an American company that leads the way in aerospace,” said Assistant Attorney General Demers.  “This case is not an isolated incident.  It is part of an overall economic policy of developing China at American expense.  We cannot tolerate a nation’s stealing our firepower and the fruits of our brainpower.  We will not tolerate a nation that reaps what it does not sow.” 

    “Innovation in aviation has been a hallmark of life and industry in the United States since the Wright brothers first designed gliders in Dayton more than a century ago,” said U.S. Attorney Glassman.  “U.S. aerospace companies invest decades of time and billions of dollars in research.  This is the American way.  In contrast, according to the indictment, a Chinese intelligence officer tried to acquire that same, hard-earned innovation through theft.  This case shows that federal law enforcement authorities can not only detect and disrupt such espionage, but can also catch its perpetrators.  The defendant will now face trial in federal court in Cincinnati.”

    "This unprecedented extradition of a Chinese intelligence officer exposes the Chinese government's direct oversight of economic espionage against the United States,” said Assistant Director Priestap.

    Yanjun Xu is a Deputy Division Director with the MSS’s Jiangsu State Security Department, Sixth Bureau.  The MSS is the intelligence and security agency for China and is responsible for counter-intelligence, foreign intelligence and political security.  MSS has broad powers in China to conduct espionage both domestically and abroad.

    Xu was arrested in Belgium on April 1, pursuant to a federal complaint, and then indicted by a federal grand jury in the Southern District of Ohio.  The government unsealed the charges today, following his extradition to the United States.  The four-count indictment charges Xu with conspiring and attempting to commit economic espionage and theft of trade secrets.

    ***

    According to the indictment:

    Beginning in at least December 2013 and continuing until his arrest, Xu targeted certain companies inside and outside the United States that are recognized as leaders in the aviation field. This included GE Aviation. He identified experts who worked for these companies and recruited them to travel to China, often initially under the guise of asking them to deliver a university presentation. Xu and others paid the experts’ travel costs and provided stipends.

    ***

    An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed a violation of criminal law and is not evidence of guilt.  Every defendant is presumed innocent until, and unless, proven guilty.

    The maximum statutory penalty for conspiracy and attempt to commit economic espionage is 15 years of incarceration.  The maximum for conspiracy and attempt to commit theft of trade secrets is 10 years.  The charges also carry potential financial penalties.  The maximum statutory sentence is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes.  If convicted of any offense, a defendant’s sentence will be determined by the court based on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    This investigation was conducted by the FBI’s Cincinnati Division, and substantial support was provided by the FBI Legal Attaché’s Office in Brussels.  The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs provided significant assistance in obtaining and coordinating the extradition of Xu, and Belgian authorities provided significant assistance in securing the arrest and facilitating the surrender of Xu from Belgium. 

    Assistant Attorney General Demers and U.S. Attorney Glassman commended the investigation of this case by the FBI and the assistance of the Belgian authorities in the arrest and extradition of Xu.  Mr. Demers and Mr. Glassman also commended the cooperation of GE Aviation throughout this investigation. The cooperation and GE Aviation’s internal controls protected GE Aviation’s proprietary information. 

    The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Timothy S. Mangan and Emily N. Glatfelter of the Southern District of Ohio, and Trial Attorneys Thea D. R. Kendler and Amy E. Larson of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.


    2018-12-12 01:15:29 | 引用
    回音宝宝
    回音宝宝
    无题
    正常交流又被砌生猪肉.

    中国一向都是自主研发, 根本不用偷.

    喷射机的风扇叶.. 小菜一碟

    美国的指控简直是侮辱

    Victim Company A has devoted
    substantial resources to research and development in the field of using unique materials to
    manufacture jet engine fan blades and fan containment structures. Victim Company A's design
    and use of ce11ain types of composite materials in fan blades and fan blade encasements provide
    greater engine durability, weight reduction. and lower costs. These fan blade and fan blade
    encasement designs provide Victim Company A with a significant competitive advantage over
    others in the industry.

    2018-12-12 01:27:53 | 引用
    无题
    你这不又把官府公文贴一边,等着吃人血馒头么?😂

    2018-12-12 01:30:13 | 引用
    放肆桀骜
    回音宝宝
    无题
    放肆桀骜 写道:
    你这不又把官府公文贴一边,等着吃人血馒头么?😂


    纯粹赚点镑镑, 别无他意.

    贸易战 + 人质战 好看.

    2018-12-12 01:32:31 | 引用
    回复帖子
    回音宝宝 写道:
    纯粹赚点镑镑, 别无他意.

    贸易战 + 人质战 好看.


    不提点些股市,来转棒棒?市场行情萧条至此了吗😭

    2018-12-12 01:34:11 | 引用
    放肆桀骜
    回音宝宝
    无题
    U) After the trip to China. XU continued to communicate with Employee I. In
    fact, XU invited Employee I to return to NUAA the following year.
    (k) On November 21, 20 17, unindicted co-conspirator CF expressed an interest
    in having Employee l travel to China to exchange ideas and instruct again at NUAA. Unindicted
    co-conspirator CF infom1ed Employee I that he had spoken with Qu Hui (XU) from JAST. and
    that Qu Hui would be able to help with travel expenses and handle the details ofthe "exchange."
    (I) On or about January 8, 2018, XU wrote to Employee I, "I will touch base
    with the scientific research department he re to see what technology is desired and I will let you
    know what to prepare. For your end, please prepare the plane ticket and date as soon as possible."

    (m) On or about January 23, 2018, XU wrote to Employee 1, "Okay. Try your
    best to collect and we can talk by then. Domestically. there is more focused [sic] on the
    system code." XU later elaborated that the infonnation he wanted pertained to ·'system
    specification, design process;· which is the application ofresearch data to engine production. XU
    provided an email address for Employee I to use to send the requested infonnation. When
    Employee I informed XU that the email may be blocked if Employee I used the company
    computer, XU responded, " It might be inappropriate to send directly from the company, right?"

    (n) On or about February 3, 2018, XU caused Employee I to send an excerptof presentation from Victim Company A, pertaining to "containment analysis" for a fan bladeencasement. The document contained a label warning that the presentation contained proprietaryinfonnation from Victim Company A.(o) On February 4, 2018, XU wrote to Employee I and acknowledged receivingthe document from Victim Company A pertaining to the "containment analysis." XU stated thathe wanted Employee I to spend time talking with the experts in China for a "more preciseconnection" and proposed a meeting date.(p) In the same message, XU sent Employee I a list of technical topicspertaining to composite materials in the manufacture offan blades and fan blade encasements thatXU's organization was interested in, after being sent infonnation that contained Victim CompanyA's proprietary warning label. Specifically, XU wrote, the ·'attached file is some domesticrequirements that I know of. can you take a look and let me know ifyou are familiar with those?"The attached list stated the following:Regarding the current development situation and future developmenrdirection o.f'Joreig11 countries ' structural material.,· fur .fan rntor !>ladesmade.from composite materials:{A question.fol/owed.}

    Regarding the design criteria.for the.fhreign co1111tries ·composite material
    rotor.fan h/ade, stator.fan blade, and.fan casing:
    / A list ofquestfo11sfol/011·ed.)
    (q) When Employee I directly advised XU that some of the posed questions
    involved Victim Company A's commercial secrets, XU replied they would discuss it when they
    met in person.
    (r) In February 2018, XU also began discussing with Employee I the
    possibility ofmeeting in Europe during one ofEmployee 1 's business 11ips.
    (s) On or about Febrnary 5, 20 18, XU asked Employee I to create and sort a
    directory ofthe files on Employee 1 's computer relating to the files of Victim Company A.
    XU asked Employee I to send a copy of the file directory for Employee 1 's company-issued
    computer. XU sent specific directions for how Employee I should sort and save such a directory.
    (t) On or about February 14. 2018, XU caused Employee I to send a computer
    file directory from Employee I's company-issued computer to XU.
    (u) On February 28, 2018, XU requested to speak with Employee I by
    telephone. During the phone call, XU referred to the file directory that Employee I sent at XU's
    request. XU told Employee I that "they" had looked at it and it is .. pretty good stuff." XU asked
    ifEmployee I would be able to bring it with Employee I when Employee I traveled to Europe for
    their meeting. XU further stated, "the computer you will bring along is the company computer,
    right?" XU also asked ifthe material Employee 1 intended to bring could be exported out of the
    computer. When Employee 1 infonned XU that it could be exported onto a portable hard drive,
    XU replied. "Good, good, good." XU asked, ··so, ifpossible, we will look over the stuff. Can we
    do that?" After Employee I agreed to XU's request, XU stated, "Do you understand? Carry the
    stuff along."

    (v) Later in the conversation on February 28, 2018, XU told Employee l that
    what Employee 1 had sent so far was '·good enough." XU continued: "Ifwe need something new
    later, we can.. . talk about that in person when we meet. .. What do you think? ... All right, we
    really, we really don 't need to rush to do everything in one time, because, if we are going to do
    business together, this won't be the last time, right?"
    (w) On March 4, 2018, Employee I informed XU that some ofthe documents
    identified on the company directory were generated from a specific software and, as a result, some
    documents could only be viewed and backed up when connected to Victim Company A's network.
    In response, XU asked, "Does that mean I will not be able to view these documents after I bring
    them back?" Employee I replied that Employee I did not know, because Employee 1 had never
    tried to open the files while in China.
    (x) On March 5, 2018, XU sent Employee I a message asking, ·'Regarding the
    document directory you sent last time. is it possible to dump it to a portable hard drive or USB
    drive from work computer in advance?"
    (y) On March I 0, 2018, XU sent Employee l a message stating, "Since there's
    still time, download more data and bring them back. Anything design related would work."
    (zJ On or about April 1, 2018, XU traveled to the Kingdom ofBelgium to meet
    Employee I for the purpose ofdiscussing and receiving the sensitive infonnation he had requested.

    2018-12-12 01:37:37 | 引用
    无题
    简直是写小说的好材料,

    书名叫:

    国产零零漆.

    2018-12-12 01:38:42 | 引用
    回音宝宝
    上一页12下一页

    发表评论

    很抱歉,仅有会员才能发表评论。

    点击此处免费注册, 或者点击此处登录,登录后您便可以发表评论。谢谢!

加西网为北美中文网传媒集团旗下网站