| 廣告聯系 | 簡體版 | 手機版 | 微信 | 微博 | 搜索:
歡迎您 游客 | 登錄 | 免費注冊 | 忘記了密碼 | 社交賬號注冊或登錄

首頁

新聞資訊

論壇

溫哥華地產

大溫餐館點評

溫哥華汽車

溫哥華教育

黃頁/二手

旅游
搜索:  

 論壇通告:  加西磅停用通知   請不要上傳第三方有版權的照片,請尊重版權,謝謝   轉載新聞請務必注明出處,這些媒體請不要轉,謝謝   批評商家需要注意  
 個人空間: 羅蓬特機器人 | 豬頭看世界 | XY | 靜觀雲卷雲舒 | 客觀中立而實事求是,唯服理據而杜絕辱罵 | 亂想 | 五木森林 | 細雨飄渺 | 真情Z下海 | 花隨風 | 湖裡湖塗 | 顧曉軍 | Amy Yi | Invisible world | rttp0sui | 大溫房產和地產研究 | zhijpjun0 | tjh96 | HFWATER | 呂洪來的個人空間
 最新求助: 請問誰知道哪裡有賣理發的電動推子?   忽然有個疑問:戰爭時期,加拿大拿PR卡未入籍的永久居民會被強制服兵役嗎?   這個銀條   如何修改會員名?
 論壇轉跳:
     發帖回帖獲取加西鎊, 兌換精彩禮物

論壇首頁 -> 減肥

Why Body Fat Percentage Is More Important Than Weight (發表於12年前)



回復主題  圖片幻燈展示  增添帖子到書簽中  給帖子中的發貼者批量贈送獻花或者花籃    |##| -> |=|        發表新主題
閱讀上一個主題 :: 閱讀下一個主題  
作者 正文
凌兒。
(只看此人)




文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:25 引用回復
Here’s a Little Secret: The scale lies. Learn why you should focus on decreasing your body fat percentage, instead of just your weight.

Stepping on the bathroom scale is a daily ritual for many dieters, athletes and fitness enthusiasts. After all being healthy and in-shape means weighing less, right?

Scales seem to be everywhere: The home bathroom, the gym or health club lPicture of Woman’s Bare Feet on a Bathroom Scale that Says Fatocker room, and – of course — the doctor’s office. We’re a society increasingly obsessed with our weight, but ironically, one that is becoming fatter than ever.

But what if you knew that your trusty scale was deceiving you? What if you found out that losing a pound or two (or even five) doesn’t mean you’ll look any thinner or more in-shape? What if I told you that losing weight is actually making you fatter?


 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
樓主 | 電梯直達
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)




文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:27 引用回復
Why Weight Loss Should Never Be Your Goal

Our preoccupation with moving that pointer on the bathroom scale down closer to zero is at the root of most people’s frustration with becoming healthier and more fit. Crash diets, fad diets, endless hours of cardio, extreme calorie restriction and eating disorders can be traced directly to our desire to step on the scale and see that we’ve lost weight.

Yet the number that you see on the scale each morning is a terrible indicator of body composition. Weight alone can’t tell you anything about the distribution of that weight. It doesn’t take into account the ratio of fat to lean tissue, which can cause very lean people to think they are fatter than they really are, and fat people to think they are leaner.

In other words, losing weight can actually be a bad thing, especially if you are doing it at the expense of lean tissue like muscle. If all you are using to gauge your fitness progress is scale weight alone, you are only getting half-the-picture.
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
沙發 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:27 引用回復
Understanding Body Fat Percentages

Body fat percentage is the only truly accurate way that you can measure your body composition.

Forget about how much you weigh or what your BMI (Body Mass Index) is. Instead, focus on your ratio of lean tissue to body fat. Once you do this, you’ll actually start looking and feeling better. And it will change your mind about the long-term effectiveness of crash diets and the basics of your workout routine.

Body Fat Percentage Isn’t Rocket Science

Your scale weight is a measure of your body’s total weight: this includes body fat; lean tissue like muscle; your internal organs like the heart, lungs, and liver; the food and liquid currently passing through your digestive tract; water retained by body tissue; and skeletal material like bones and their connective tissue.

The number the scale displays when you step on it doesn’t make distinctions between they types of weight it is measuring. It just lumps it all together.

But it should make distinctions.

A person can actually have a high body weight on the scale, but be extremely lean. I know this runs counter to what you’ve heard, but it’s true. What really matters is how much body fat you have sitting on top of all of that lean tissue and skeletal and connective material. If you have a lot of body fat, you’ll appear “fat” and bulky, if you have very little, you’ll look “lean” and slim.

And here’s the key point: This holds true regardless of your weight.
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
板凳 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:28 引用回復
The Differences Between Body Fat and Muscle

Body fat (adipose tissue) is metabolically inactive. This means it’s primary function is to store calories, not to consume them. A pound of fat burns around 2 calories per day to maintain itself. The purpose of body fat is to store energy (in the form of excess calories) for use later, when food is scarce. This is an evolutionary adaptation based on the way we lived thousands of years ago, when the availability of food was spotty.

But today, people can consistently consume enough calories (and often more) to maintain their basic functions.

Fat storage is not as critical as it once was, yet we continue to eat as if famine was just around the corner. Even worse, changes in our diet from whole grain, complex carbohydrates to highly-processed foods have encouraged our bodies to store more calories as fat, even though it’s unlikely we will ever need them.

Muscle, on the other hand, burns around 6 calories per day — and that is at rest.

Exercise the muscle (for example, during weight training) and you can burn an upwards of 250 calories, depending on your existing levels of lean body mass.

Why Fat Makes You Look Fatter, And Muscle Makes You Look Leaner

Your body displays fat and muscle differently. One pound of muscle looks very different on the body from one pound of fat. Muscle makes you appear leaner, while fat just … well … makes you look fat.

Increasing your ratio of muscle to fat can make you look more in-shape, even though the scale may say you are heavier. Likewise, you can actually lose a lot of weight, and look extremely out of shape. Fitness trainer and natural bodybuilder Tom Venuto calls this the “fat skinny person” syndrome.

This is why looking only at the weight on a scale lies.

Body Fat Illustrated: The Proof is in The Pictures

Not convinced?

The best way to illustrate how muscle itself make you look more lean, versus scale weight is to see some actual real-world examples.

Let’s take a look at two picture to see why.

First, let’s look at Nicole Richie (she is about 5′ 1″ and around 95 lbs in this picture):



Picture of Very Underweight Nicole Richie in a Bikini on the Beach
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
地板 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:29 引用回復
Now, take a look at someone like Michelle Parker, a fitness model with the exact same height as Nicole Richie, but she weighs ten pounds more in this picture:

Fitness Model Michelle Parker

Or how about IFBB Pro Fitness competitor Jen Cook:

Fitness Model Jen Cook

Jen Cook is the exact same height as Nicole Richie, but her weight falls between 117 lbs (off-season) and 108-110 lbs (leading up to a competition.) I would estimate Jen probably between 9-13 percent body fat here.

One more great example: fitness model and actress Amanda Carrier. Amanda is 5’5″ and says her weight is usually between 125-130 lbs at 14-16% body fat.

No one would ever accuse Amanda (who is also a professional swimwear model) of being overweight. Yet, her scale weight might surprise many people who assume she is much lighter than 130 (a very healthy, lean weight, by the way.) Even more impressive, Carrier says she is able to more or less maintain that body fat level without going through the draconian bulking and cutting cycles of female fitness figure competitors.Picture of Fitness Model Amanda Carrier Posing in Brown Bikini

So you tell me who is in better shape? Which of the three has those coveted great abs and amazing tone and muscle definition?
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
5 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:30 引用回復
Weigh More and Look Better? Why Weight Alone Is Deceiving

Nicole Richie clearly weighs less. But I would estimate that Michelle, Jen and Amanda have at least 1/3 more muscle mass than Nicole and weigh 10-20 lbs more (which is actually a substantial difference at their height.) And neither of them look “bulky” or overly muscular. In fact, they probably represent what most women would consider to be an “ideal” bikini-ready body.

Yet, if you depended on scale-weight alone to determine body composition, Michelle and Jen would lose out to Nicole Richie, which would be clearly absurd and inaccurate. And because Michelle and Jen carry more muscle, they are more metabolically-active than Nicole Richie. That means that even at rest, they burn more calories naturally than Nicole (and therefore, can actually eat more.)

Think about that for a second. The heavier of the two actually burns more calories doing nothing more than the lighter woman because they have more muscle.

Extreme calorie restriction has left Nicole with little muscle mass, which translates into a flat, boney appearance. Bottom line is that she looks unhealthy compared against Michelle and Jen, who are fit, toned and clearly in great physical shape.

My point here is not to pick on Nicole Richie, who clearly is struggling with an eating disorder, but rather to show that by constantly focusing on bodyweight, many people sabotage their ultimate goal of improving their appearance and becoming more healthy and fit overall.

Body Fat By The Numbers

Let me give you one more example, with numbers, to illustrate what I’m talking about.

Let’s look at two men of the same age:

Jim weighs 170 lbs with 20% body fat. Mark weighs 175 lbs (5 lbs more) at 10% body fat. This means Jim has 11 lbs of fat on him, while Mark — even at the higher weight — carries only 5.5 lbs of fat. Which of these two people will look leaner, despite the difference in scale weight?

Mark will. He has less fat, which means better muscle definition.

So again, the scale lies.

This is why using the scale alone to determine body composition and appearance is a dead-end.
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
6 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:30 引用回復
Body Fat Percentage: A Better Goal

A much better approach is to look at your percentage of body fat compared against your total weight. Once you start thinking this way, that daily weigh-in becomes much less important.

Your goal should never be to lose weight, it should be to lose fat.

In the course of stripping off fat, you typically will lose some scale weight (along with some muscle,) but your objective should always be to maximize fat loss, while minimizing muscle loss.

If you lose too much muscle along with the fat, your body fat percentage can actually remain the same (or even increase slightly.) And that isn’t progress, even though the scale tells you that you are lighter.


DID YOU KNOW? Although a pound of fat and a pound of muscle weight exactly the same, a pound of fat has more volume and takes up more space on your body.
.
An ideal scenario would actually be to see your body fat percentage decrease, while your scale weight remains stable. This means that you are losing fat, without losing and muscle (and in this scenario, you would have actually gained some muscle.) However, this almost never happens because it is difficult to gain muscle and lose fat simultaneously. So a more realistic goal would be to see moderate weight loss accompanied by a decrease in body fat.

If you find yourself losing weight, but not losing much body fat in the process, then you need to either change your diet or your workout routine. The most likely culprit is that you’ve restricted calories too much and your body is tapping muscle for fuel. This can be the start of a vicious cycle, because with less muscle, you actually burn fewer calories. And burning excess calories is necessary to lose fat.
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
7 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:30 引用回復
Measuring Body Fat

There are a number of ways to measure body fat. There are electronic scales that can give you a basic idea of your body fat percentages, but they are fairly inaccurate. The most convenient, inexpensive and accurate method for testing your body fat percentages at home is with Accu-Measure body fat calipers. Your gym or personal trainer may also have calipers and can take the measurements for you.

Ready to throw out your bathroom scale? Not so fast.

Although I’ve been pretty rough on the bathroom scale, the scale is necessary when measuring fat loss because the measurements taken with the calipers need to be calculated against your scale weight to determine what percentage of your total weight is fat. So while the scale alone can’t tell you your body composition, neither can calipers. You need both to get an accurate measure.
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
8 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
凌兒。
(只看此人)



文章 時間: 2014-3-30 23:31 引用回復
www.answerfitness.com/...r-fitness/
 
花籃
分享
_________________
“If kindness doesn’t work, try more kindness.” Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche
9 樓 | 返回頂端
閱讀會員資料 發送站內短信 主題 User photo gallery 禮物  
 
回復主題     |##| -> |=|     論壇首頁 -> 減肥 所有的時間均為 美國太平洋時間
1頁,共1


注:
  • 以上論壇所有發言僅代表發帖者個人觀點, 並不代表本站觀點或立場, 加西網對此不負任何責任。
  • 投資理財及買房賣房版面的帖子不構成投資建議。投資有風險,責任請自負
  • 對二手買賣中的虛假信息,買賣中的糾紛等均與本站無關。
  • 不能在本論壇發表新主題
    不能在本論壇回復主題
    不能在本論壇編輯自己的文章
    不能在本論壇刪除自己的文章
    不能在本論壇發表投票
    不能在這個論壇添加附件
    可以在這個論壇下載文件

    論壇轉跳: 

    凌兒。, 凌兒。, 凌兒。, 凌兒。, 凌兒。, 凌兒。, 凌兒。, 凌兒。, 凌兒。
    潛力帖子 精華帖子 熱門帖子
    你是壞孩子嗎?
    鄧小平不止是屠夫,還是一個浪漫的...
    【緊急通知】躺平、怠工是危害國家...
    阿聯拋震撼彈:5月1日退出OPEC
    本宮在蘇丹阿都沙末大廈裡泡了一下午
    日本京都。自助投幣式置物櫃。藝術...
    挽救一下楊振寧:時空會不會被反射?
    繼續挽救IBM。
    還大美麗新疆,笑死了。新疆穆斯林...
    中國進入朝鮮新時代,收繳護照 嚴禁...
    一大早就兩個“好他馬的”
    關於: 加拿大皇家鑄幣廠的網站
    曹,川普中期選舉穩了,又躲過了子...
    唐師曾得了白血病
    伊朗油井報廢
    Royal Canadian Mint 皇家鑄幣廠202...
    Royal Canadian Mint 皇家鑄幣廠202...
    TransLink推出限量版Hello Kitty公交卡
    換幣活動
    加拿大將發行紀念皇家軍團(The Roy...
    加拿大將發行第二枚夜光幣
    Royal Canadian Mint 皇家鑄幣廠202...
    奧蘭多(二)迪士尼動物王國 未來世界...
    奧蘭多(一)城市地標及海洋世界
    Royal Canadian Mint 2026年2月新幣
    坎昆(一)
    推薦一個digital的手持放大鏡
    RCM 2026年1月新幣
    拆卷有驚喜
    爐關尋覓記
    特朗普又幹了件冒天下之大不韙的事...
    本宮鋼琴彈奏原聲第1彈 一首前奏曲
    謝謝管理員秉公執法廢除reddragon的id
    超級重磅!加拿大要進口中國電動車!
    皮爾今天在溫哥華 - 藍色wave - 保...
    幾分鍾前,中國強硬反擊,征34+50,...
    曼谷高樓直接倒了
    我說我希望特朗普贏,老公氣得眼睛...
    知乎?加西網上為什麼有老流氓劉廳...
    明明有能力統台,大陸為何遲遲不動手?
    貌似ndp稍占上風。。。。。
    今天是感恩節,跟大家道個別,以後...
    咱最後還是投了ndp
    生平第一次被偷車了
    中國會不會武統台灣

    最新新聞 熱門新聞 熱評新聞
    深圳女子制止吸煙竟被警方「裸檢」羞辱 全網炸鍋
    查爾斯國王演講:詩意 玩笑 對特朗普的微妙反駁
    槍手突襲晚宴,曾2次"怒懟"特朗普的女記者成焦點
    阿聯酋"不告而別",歐佩克控價能力不復當年
    AI造富,三星家族財富一年翻倍至3000億
    彌漫社會各個角落的反智主義如何阻擋中國轉型之路?
    德總理稱美國正被伊朗羞辱,特朗普回應
    加州啟動"最高級別"全境嚴查 超速是唯一查處重點
    OpenAI緊急"滅火":企業業務和廣告業務正在增長
    小號柳岩!會撒嬌的女同事最致命!
    邁克爾·傑克遜傳記片橫掃北美票房
    單親媽媽黃一鳴宣布要起訴王思聰:讓整個網友...
    秦昊一句話讓孫楊懵了!內娛最敢說的男人,撕開...
    英王查爾斯三世在美國國會發表演說
    特朗普白宮迎接查爾斯三世,刻意回避敏感議題
    美國汽油價格升至近4年來最高水平....
    太監王承恩為崇禎做了一件事,令後人流淚
    台灣總統府是技校....中國高德地圖改名
    突破!新型車膜讓汽車在烈日下自動散熱
    月鱗綺紀:驚天反轉寄靈竟是龍神,小唯神力失控釀驚天危機!
    困擾人類百年的問題,終於迎來突破性進展
    蘋果《足球教練》第四季8月5日首播,Ted轉戰女足賽場
    蘋果最狂MacBook曝光 想裝哪就裝哪
    主食換一換,全身炎症水平都降了
    中國勒索全球 這金屬價格一年漲5倍
    第二個總統任期新低,川普支持率再跌
    新研究確認宇宙學爭議 待新物理學給出解釋
    風潮要回來了!iPhone帶頭、安卓跟進
    10年後找不到替代品 日媒曝4款可伴你一生的車
    奇點臨近!全球AI終局戰,只剩他倆的雙人舞
    96歲奶奶擺攤10年還清2077萬元債務 本人最新回應
    中國勒索全球 這金屬價格一年漲5倍
    白宮怒批"准寡婦"玩笑,美名嘴強硬反擊
    很健康卻突發心梗?加國找到了真凶
    美國汽油價格升至近4年來最高水平....
    太監王承恩為崇禎做了一件事,令後人流淚
    台灣總統府是技校....中國高德地圖改名
    突破!新型車膜讓汽車在烈日下自動散熱
    月鱗綺紀:驚天反轉寄靈竟是龍神,小唯神力失控釀驚天危機!
    困擾人類百年的問題,終於迎來突破性進展
    蘋果《足球教練》第四季8月5日首播,Ted轉戰女足賽場
    蘋果最狂MacBook曝光 想裝哪就裝哪
    主食換一換,全身炎症水平都降了
    第二個總統任期新低,川普支持率再跌
    新研究確認宇宙學爭議 待新物理學給出解釋

    更多方式閱讀論壇:

    Android: 加西網
    [下載]

    Android: 溫哥華論壇
    [下載]

    PDA版本: 論壇

    加西網微信

    加西網微博


    Powered by phpBB 2.0.8
    Terms & Conditions    Privacy Policy    Political ADs    Activities Agreement    Contact Us    Sitemap    

    加西網為北美中文網傳媒集團旗下網站

    頁面生成: 0.0316 秒 and 5 DB Queries in 0.0014 秒