8、2021年12月14日更新:质疑方针对伦敦行政法庭第二次裁决提出新的诉求:(1)行政法庭ICO于11月26日作出裁决:LSE没有菜论文口试人员名单和口试报告;(2)LSE法务主管半年前向中华民国法务部发文,提供了两位菜论文口试委员名单作为法庭证据,台法务部根据这个LSE信件向台湾菜论文质疑者发出通缉令。根据ICO第二次裁决,LSE法务主管半年前提供的口试人员名单可能是无中生有(the school cannot provide what it does not have)。请求青天大老爷判明LSE究竟有还是没有。。。
9、2021年19日更新:2021年12月18日伦敦行政法庭裁决中,法官否定了伦敦大学有关1984年菜论文在图书馆丢失或摆错书架的说法,因为图书馆根本就没有该论文的入馆档案和微缩胶片。 “The appellant says that the absence of the original thesis from any of the libraries, as required by the University’s rules, indicates that there was no thesis at the time. Having viewed the emails from the libraries and the video from Dr. Peng, it does appear that none of the libraries have a record of the thesis being provided at the time the PhD was awarded in 1984. We accept that the explanation provided by the University that the thesis had been lost or mis-shelved may not be correct, as there is no catalogue or microfilm record of the original thesis.”