Nevada District Judge James Russell rejected a Republican attempt to declare President Trump the winner of the Nevada election.
One day after a lengthy evidentiary hearing, Russell wrote that the “contestant did not prove under any standard of proof” the long list of accusations against the Biden-Harris campaign, including paying voters to cast ballots.
Russell denied their request to replace Democratic electors with Republican electors.
Because I take fraud claims seriously, I have personally requested that President Trump’s team, including former Attorney General Adam Laxalt, file an official complaint and supporting evidence with my office. They have yet to send in a complaint that details and provides evidence for the allegations they have publicly been making. Absent such a complaint and supporting evidence, these claims of widespread voter fraud remain baseless and, moreover, are insulting to the countless of elections workers who have diligently overseen our elections.
Binnall and the Nevada Republican Party also provided these allegations:
2,468 votes by voters who changed their address to another state or country
42,284 voters who voted twice
About 20,000 voters who voted in Nevada without a Nevada mailing address
他們提供了什麼證據證明這三條?其中第一,第二,數字這麼精確。
我也不知道他們哪來的數據, 但根據法官, 沒有相應的證據可以支持否定州普選結果。
Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote in his order.
Binnall and the Nevada Republican Party also provided these allegations:
2,468 votes by voters who changed their address to another state or country
42,284 voters who voted twice
About 20,000 voters who voted in Nevada without a Nevada mailing address
他們提供了什麼證據證明這三條?其中第一,第二,數字這麼精確。
我也不知道他們哪來的數據, 但根據法官, 沒有相應的證據可以支持否定州普選結果。
Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote in his order.
Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote in his order.
Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote in his order.