[春月]

和法庭外的陈述截然不同啊。

[flyfish]

楼主英语真好

[男人你懂的]

谢谢信息，加西川粉正在路上赶来

[四季豆]

不是说美国法庭不允许摄像吗

[⑩头鸟]

flyfish 写道:

楼主英语真好

猪党同人惯用的伎俩，断章取义，你看到整个过程了吗？没有
你知道整个律师是谁？不清楚？倒钩没准！
看下面评论的素质，堪忧。
楼主估计想考个初级翻译证吧，法庭翻译收费$100, 不错的营生

[flyfish]

⑩头鸟 写道:

猪党同人惯用的伎俩，断章取义，你看到整个过程了吗？没有 你知道整个律师是谁？不清楚？倒钩没准！ 看下面评论的素质，堪忧。 楼主估计想考个初级翻译证吧，法庭翻译收费$100, 不错的营生

没有告fraud的case。TA说没有fraud。考翻译证太抬举某人了

[春月]

另外一个宾州的case， 朱李安尼告诉法官： 这不是一个关于舞弊的诉讼。他们并没有起诉舞弊。
[b]Pennsylvania[/b]

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

[春月]

在另一个宾州CASE， 在法官的追问下， 川普律师回答道： 据我现在所知， 这个case， 没有舞弊行为。


[color=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.95)]In a separate state case in Montgomery County, Pa., a judge asked Trump lawyer Jonathan S. Goldstein whether he was alleging fraud. “Your honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein said. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the [Democratic National Committee] or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith.” The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”[/color]

[⑩头鸟]

flyfish 写道:

⑩头鸟 写道: 猪党同人惯用的伎俩，断章取义，你看到整个过程了吗？没有 你知道整个律师是谁？不清楚？倒钩没准！ 看下面评论的素质，堪忧。 楼主估计想考个初级翻译证吧，法庭翻译收费$100, 不错的营生 没有告fraud的case。TA说没有fraud。考翻译证太抬举某人了

杀人犯没有定罪之前不能叫给人扣个“凶手”的帽子。 楼主思路不清。

[春月]

在 Bucks 县的起诉里， 川普律师的陈诉里指出: 对于提出的有争议的选票，上诉方并没有提出舞弊指控。

Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots


In yet another state case in Bucks County, Pa., Trump’s attorneys signed a joint stipulation of facts that explicitly admits that they are not alleging fraud, despite the President and his lawyers’ repeated public claims, [/size][/color]according to Marc Elias[color=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.95)], a lawyer working for Democrats on election-related cases. The stipulation of facts reads in part: “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots.” The stipulation also says they don’t allege or have evidence of “misconduct” or “impropriety” in connection with the challenged ballots.[/color]