[新的霸]

房價下來了，政府估價也下來了，地稅卻上去了。

[MyLuckIsBack]

地稅永遠是往上的～～

[damnff]

政府天天說公共服務需要錢

看看他們的薪金跟福利啊

地稅都去了哪裡呢？😁

[明娘娘]

damnff 寫道:

政府天天說公共服務需要錢 看看他們的薪金跟福利啊 地稅都去了哪裡呢？😁

都去不要臉的他們的薪金跟福利裡去了

[damnff]

阿明 寫道:

都去不要臉的他們的薪金跟福利裡去了

對啊，發覺加拿大選民不知道是好忽悠，還是太守法了

[Buswell牙牙]

滴水和房價沒關吧

[平行空間]

明知故問太矯情。

[新的霸]

BuswellDental 寫道:

滴水和房價沒關吧

不知道，有沒有專業人士來解釋一下？

[VCIMessenger]

新的霸 寫道:

BuswellDental 寫道: 滴水和房價沒關吧 不知道，有沒有專業人士來解釋一下？

In Vancouver, property tax is determined by the city budget. It has nothing to do with property values. So, if city government wants to spend $1.2B this year, they will spend $1.2B. The property tax for each household is determined by dividing that $1.2B by the total assessed values of all properties in the city to get a per dollar mill rate. That mill rate is then multiplied by your personal housing assessment value to get the property tax.

Eg) if total assessed property value is $240B then the per assessed dollar value mill rate = $1.2B / $240B = 0.5%.

If your house is assessed at $1M then your property tax bill is 0.5% * $1M = $5000.

This is the simplified explanation.

In US, the situation is reversed. The city gets its money based on a pre-set mill rate and if it wants to spend more $$$ then it either has to raise the mill rate or issue bonds subject to restrictions.

This is also why Vancouver keeps advertising that it has the lowest property tax rate (as a %, not actual $ amount) and why this means it NEEDS to raise property tax higher. Really stupid reasons but thank goodness they don't teach simple math and logic reasoning anymore in school.

[靈猴]

你想房子增值還是地稅下來？