移民生活北美论坛 :: 温哥华不眠夜 - 川普律师团队在威斯康辛州又吞一败

#1: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-12-03 13:30

川普律师团队要求威斯康辛州最高法院审理关于221，000选票无效的案子。

威斯康辛州最高法院今天决定拒绝接受川普团队提出的案件，坚持这个案件必须先由低级法庭进行证据事实上的审核。

川普律师团队之前要求直接入禀威斯康辛州最高法院是因为这个法院是保守派占多数的法院。最后法院以4-3 驳回了诉求。

The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear U.S. President Donald Trump's lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts.

The legal defeat was the latest in a string of losses for Trump's post-election lawsuits. Judges in multiple battleground states have rejected his claims of fraud or irregularities.

Trump had asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state's two biggest Democratic counties, alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were administered. His lawsuit echoed claims that were earlier rejected by election officials in those counties during a recount that barely affected Biden's winning margin of about 20,700 votes.

Trump had wanted the conservative-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case directly, saying there wasn't enough time to wage the legal battle by starting first with a lower court given the looming Dec. 14 date when presidential electors cast their votes. But attorneys for Gov. Tony Evers and the state Department of Justice argued the law required the lawsuit to start with lower courts.

The court ruled 4-3 against Trump, with swing Justice Brian Hagedorn joining three liberal justices in denying the petition. The order said Trump can file in circuit court.

It was not immediately known if Trump would still pursue the case through lower courts. He filed a similar lawsuit in federal court on Wednesday.

#3: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-12-03 13:42

接下来就看美国最高法院会不会接纳宾州议员上周二提出的上诉案件了。

#4: 作者: 男人你懂的, 时间: 2020-12-03 13:52

只要粉丝愿意奉献，这样的官司继续打。

#5: 作者: 被禁止的用户, 时间: 2020-12-03 13:53

希望能置川普于死地，加油

#6: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-12-03 13:55

男人你懂的写道:

只要粉丝愿意奉献，这样的官司继续打。

确实，毕竟捐款的小头才用在打官司，大头去别的地方了。稳赚不赔的生意。

#7: 作者: 男人你懂的, 时间: 2020-12-03 13:58

春月写道:

确实，毕竟捐款的小头才用在打官司，大头去别的地方了。稳赚不赔的生意。

拖到最后，又挣钱又给白等添堵，何乐而不为。

#8: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-12-03 14:01

男人你懂的写道:

春月写道:

确实，毕竟捐款的小头才用在打官司，大头去别的地方了。稳赚不赔的生意。

拖到最后，又挣钱又给白等添堵，何乐而不为。

但是，有位议员也说的对，搞政治的人，大家记住的只是你最后做的事情。

这是不是杀敌一千，自损八百的愚蠢行为，就等时间去证明了。

#9: 作者: littlecomment, 时间: 2020-12-03 14:03

感觉美国整个法院是一个体系，虽然有保守或自由派法官，应该有一定的延续性和基本准则，不会一会儿风一会儿雨的，不然这体系这么多年来本身就是个问题。Hearings 搞了这么多证人，让法院来判吧，真的假不了，假的也会露馅儿。再看吧！

#10: 作者: 男人你懂的, 时间: 2020-12-03 14:06

春月写道:

但是，有位议员也说的对，搞政治的人，大家记住的只是你最后做的事情。

这是不是杀敌一千，自损八百的愚蠢行为，就等时间去证明了。

川普很精的，他现在体会到了当总统的情况，4年后他怎么会还来竞选。即使有意愿，共和党还会推他出来？他现在的言辞是继续鼓动粉丝的热情，把捐献继续到底，也为以后的商业准备人气。