#1: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:05

今天稍微看了一下案件的细节。 感觉川普律师团队的诉求挺奇葩的。

To sum up this case. The argument is that because two voters (the plaintiffs) did not get to cure their votes, their votes did not get counted therefore all votes in Pennsylvania need to be tossed. The judge pointed out the correct remedy would be to allow the two votes to be counted instead of trashing 7 million votes. An analogy I saw someone else make is Trump's legal team is arguing that if the defendant damaged my car the remedy is not to have the car fixed but to have the defendant damage all of the cars in Pennsylvania. Further Trump's team is arguing that the votes for president are unconstitutional and illegitimate but the votes for all of the down ballot candidates are legal and should be counted. So the same act is both unconstitutional and constitutional at the same time. Finally the original complaint is that Democratic counties allowed their voters to cure their ballots , but that Republican counties did not even though the Secretary of the State of Pennsylvania told all counties that they could help their respective voters to cure the ballot. So the Judge also wondered why the Republican Counties were not being sued since they are the ones that disenfranchised the voters by not allowing them to cure their votes. So is anyone crossing their fingers that the Appeals Court will over turn the judgement.

#2: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:11

而且， 川普律师团队并没有上诉要求高院推翻宾州法院的裁决。 而只是要求高院告诉地方法官， 允许他们在地方法院修改起诉案件的诉求。
之前， 宾州法院的法官烦了他们老是把诉求改来改去， 所以不允许他们改了。 现在他们上诉要求允许他们改。


An expedited review means we'll have a decision by the end of the week. By the way, before you get too excited, the Trump Campaign is NOT asking the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the Pennsylvania election result. Read the last 3 paragraphs of the article. The Trump campaign is simply appealing on the basis that the lower Court did not allow the Trump Campaign to amend their complaint. The Trump campaign is only asking the Third Circuit to send the matter back down to the lower court to have another hearing based on an amended complaint.

Trump's argument on appeal is basically that it was "unfair" of the district court judge not to allow backsies and undo amendments to the complaint, FILED BY THE TRUMP LEGAL TEAM, which narrowed the scope thereof (eliminating 5 of the 7 counts).The judge did not take too kindly to Trump's wasting time by repeatedly flip-flopping both legal counsel and legal arguments. As a result, the judge denied the second amendment to the complaint and dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice.

#3: 作者: 男人你懂的, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:21

世上最怕认真二字，楼主威武。

#4: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:25

总结一下 ，他们的诉求就是。 因为有两张投川普的票填的不规范， 也没有被允许修改， 被剔除出去了没有算进结果， 法官的建议是那就把这两张票也算进去， 但川普律师不同意，要求把宾州的700万票都要宣布作废。

#5: 作者: 本那比的经略, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:27

男人你懂的 写道:

世上最怕认真二字，楼主威武。

的确威武，一个几近法盲的货去评价专业律师，还有比这更搞笑的吗？

#6: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:27

男人你懂的 写道:

世上最怕认真二字，楼主威武。

所以， 他的律师团队就是在庭外敢嚣张。 进了法庭在法官面前马上就老实了。

#7: 作者: 慎独, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:29

楼主受累

发完英文，还得帮那帮人总结翻译

#8: 作者: 春月, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:30

本那比的经略 写道:

男人你懂的 写道: 世上最怕认真二字，楼主威武。 的确威武，一个几近法盲的货去评价专业律师，还有比这更搞笑的吗？

呵呵， 川普的专业律师已经是全美国的笑话了。

这可不是我说的， 川普的前盟友说的。

你信不信由你。 我信了， 不行吗？

#9: 作者: 本那比的经略, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:31

春月 写道:

呵呵， 川普的专业律师已经是全美国的笑话了。 这可不是我说的， 川普的前盟友说的。 你信不信由你。 我信了， 不行吗？

那你就信呗，谁也拦不住。。。

#10: 作者: 男人你懂的, 时间: 2020-11-24 17:38

慎独 写道:

楼主受累 发完英文，还得帮那帮人总结翻译

说到点子上了，造谣污蔑的成本太低，认真对待真相的人太苦。
加西这帮川粉，舔着脸叫嚣民主自由，却没有实事求是的态度，丢人。